Imperial Politics.
(UNITED ritESS ASSOCIATION.;
(By Ekctric Telegraph— Copyright.)
LoN"i)ON, Jnn. 25. By 2<'}7 votes to 131 tho IT- use of Commons lvjfc-tvd Mi- Pe.ln.ond's amen-ltuont to tho Arldres, -in -Reply. The ni=ijovityii;(ludfd M Nationalists und 71 Radicals.
Th« abstention of tho lioseberyites was a protest a^inst the Nationalists' methods, fspocirtlly in resmrd to tho traitorous speeches."
Tli- TJ ( .:n J AtV.i:^;ou. Adore y-Gcnej-iil for li eland, snid thore Whs no seriouß crimn in Ireland. Tho League had not bppn proclaimed, fttid could easily be revived under another name. The non-payment of rent aud boycotting wei-a cases which were properly dealt with by magistrates instead of juries.
Mr Motley, in a vigorous criticism of tho speech, supported the nm&udment, aud advocated colonial selfgovernment for Ireland. •»■?' Vailo> a New Zealanderj a Radical, and a- Ros?beryite, is a bandidatefor Eccleehall, tlie seat rendered vacant by tho death of Sir Ash mead - Bartlett.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BA19020127.2.12
Bibliographic details
Bush Advocate, Volume XIII, Issue 2184, 27 January 1902, Page 2
Word Count
150Imperial Politics. Bush Advocate, Volume XIII, Issue 2184, 27 January 1902, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in