WHARF HITCH.

Auckland Star, Volume LXXI, Issue 180, 31 July 1940, Page 11

WHARF HITCH.

LEAVING OF CARGO.

CASE OF THE MONTEREY. REPORT TO COMMISSION. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) WELLINGTON, Tuesday. The facts elicited 'Sy the Waterfront Control Commission in its investigation into the refusal of Auckland waterside workers to continue loading the Monterey after 6 p.m. on Saturday, which resulted in cargo being left behind when the ship sailed for- Suva, were stated to-day by the chairman of the commission, Mr. R. E. Price, on receipt of a report from Captain Stanich, .waterfront controller at Auckland.

Mr. Price said the men were engaged to start work at 11 a.m. on the arrival of the Monterey, which had been delayed in the Tasman. The union's representative and the two wharf superintendents were advised by the company that loading would be completed by 5 p.m. and there would be no need for extended hours to be worked. During the afternoon a request was made for the men to work until 6 p.m. to finish the loading and they agreed to do so. At 4.30 p.m. the timekeeper approached the gangs. in the big hatches and asked them to knock off at 5 p.m. and return at 6 p.m. This the men refused to do. Not Consulted. It appeared to him from the report that if the company had given an order in the forenoon for even one or two of the five gangs to work after 6 p.m. there would have been no difficulty, Mr. Price stated. Further, had the waterfront controller or either of the wharf superintendents been advised that there was a doubt about the men not working late, appropriate arrangements could have been made, but for some reason neither Captain Standich nor the wharf superintendents were consulted. The company had been insistent that the men would finish about 5 p.m. or 6 p.m. and they had not anticipated any necessity for working extended hours.

The reason why notice of intention to work cargo after 6 p.m. on Saturday was required during the forenoon was to enable the men to advise their homes during the lunch hours that they would not be home for tea. It also enabled men who had made prior arrangements for Saturday night to notify the bureau, so that they could be replaced.

In the case of the Monterey the men had no knowledge when they started work in the morning that they would be required to work extended hours. In fact, they were told that they would not be called upon to work such hours.

Mr. Price added that the report did not indicate the full circumstances of loading, and a further report had been asked for. The rate of loading in two of the hatches appeared to have been slow, but there might have been special reasons. In the other hatches the men h-id done exceptionally good work, according to the stevedore. In one case the overl >ading of the slings had carried the gear away, with a consequent delay of half an hour. Cargo left on the wharf consisted of 200 sacks of hides and 50 sacks of meat casings.