Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HAND IN MANGLE.

ACCIDENT IN LAUNDRY

GIRL LOSES FINGERS.

£1300 DAMAGES CLAIMED.

Injuries received by a girl 17 years of age, Monica Ethel Mathcson, while working in a laundry at Devonport on May 23, 1935, led to a claim for £1300 general'damages in tlie Supreme Court to-day, before Mr. Justice Fair. The action was brought through the girl's father, James Alexander Matheson, theatrical employee (Mr. West), the defendant being W. D. Meiklejolin (Mr. Richmond), the proprietor of the laundry. Mr. West explained that the girl with two others was engaged putting a tablecloth through a mangle into which her right hand was drawn, held there for about eight minutes, and "cooked" by the steam from the hot box. It was alleged, he said, that the roller was inadequately guarded. There was a guard, but it was contended that it was ineffective. In addition to the alleged failure properly to protect the machinery it was submitted that the defendant was further negligent in that he failed to instruct the plaintiff in the use of the machine. Finally there was negligence in the undue delay in releasing the girl's hand from the machine, submitted counsel. Contributory Negligence Denied. Counsel added that the defence would deny the allegations of negligence and say that it was the negligence or contributory negligence of the plaintiff which caused the accident. It would be said that the plaintiff had her head turned away, but this she would refute, said Mr. West. The result of the accident, concluded counsel, was that plaintiff had to have her fingers amputated, leaving her only a stump. The first day she was put to work (it the machine the defendant's son told her not to be frightened as there was no danger, said the plaintiff in evidence.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19360428.2.84

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 99, 28 April 1936, Page 8

Word Count
295

HAND IN MANGLE. Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 99, 28 April 1936, Page 8

HAND IN MANGLE. Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 99, 28 April 1936, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert