POLITICAL STIR.
Federal Attorney-General's Action Challenged. ACCEPTANCE OF BRIEF. (Received 9.30 a.m.) CANBERRA, this day. , A political stir was caused yesterday when a Labour member of the House of Representatives, Mr. Maurice Blackburn, who represents a Victorian constituency, moved the adjournment of the House to discuss "the acceptance by the Federal Attorney-General, Mr. R. G. Menzies, of a brief from Victorian persons or bodies concerned in a dried fruits appeal case before the Privy Council." Mr. Blackburn stated that Mr. Menzies is now in London representing the Commonwealth in that appeal. His action in accepting a brief, and, it was reported, a fee of 2000 guineas, to represent the State of Victoria, whose interests in the appeal were identical with those of the Commonwealth, was, he said, a violation of the spirit, if not the letter, of section 45 of the Commonwealth Constitution which was liable to render his seat vacant. Mr. Blackburn claimed that the veriest junior could say what Mr. Menzies was going to say which was that Victoria concurred with the Commonwealth argument. Mr. W. M. Hughes, Minister of Health, defending Mr. Menzies, contended that it was very proper that Victoria should be represented in this appeal and no better person could be selected than tlie man who was formerly Attorney-General of that State. It was true that the test of propriety must be the effect of Mr. Menzies' actions in the public interest, and in this instance they certainly were not conflicting with public interest. New South Wales was to be represented by its Attorney-General, Mr. Manning. The Prime Minister, Mr. J. A. Lyons, said that Mr. Menzies' action was not in conflict with the Constitution, but whether the Victorian Government should pay Mr. Menzies an honorarium was not a matter for the Federal Government. The motion was defeated on a party division by 38 to 23 votes. MR. MENZIES SILENT. REFUSAL TO COMMENT. (Received 1.30 p.m.) LONDON, March 31. Mr. R. G. Menzies refuses to comment on the Labour allegations that he improperly accepted a brief from Victoria in the Privy Council case.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19360401.2.47
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 78, 1 April 1936, Page 7
Word Count
348POLITICAL STIR. Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 78, 1 April 1936, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.