Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROTECTION OF BIRDS.

In reply to "H.T.E," I still contend that it is a greater act of cruelty to release any bird bred in captivity than to keep it caged, and when he talks of releasing canaries, birds that have been bred in captivity for 300 years, lie is talking nonsense. They would not survive two days. Anyway, Nature is cruel, more cruel than cages—the law of the survival of the fittest is the law of Nature. Cats, weasels, hawks, all take their toll. Anyway, the two instances I quoted in my last letter prove that even a wild bird —when released and able to mix with his own kind and species —does not thank you, but conies back to his cage in relief for safety. CANARY.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19351102.2.45.3

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVI, Issue 260, 2 November 1935, Page 8

Word Count
127

PROTECTION OF BIRDS. Auckland Star, Volume LXVI, Issue 260, 2 November 1935, Page 8

PROTECTION OF BIRDS. Auckland Star, Volume LXVI, Issue 260, 2 November 1935, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert