Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BIOLOGY AND THE FUTURE.

Sir Flinders Petrie has counted the ruins, buried in mud or sand in the silent places of the world, of seven civilisations much like ours (says the "Manchester Guardian"). Recently biology, through the mouth of Professor Langdon Brown, held a provisional j inquest 011 the body of the eighth and last, which is our own. Why is it that in country after country men are deliberately turning their backs on the evolutionary process, deliberately preferring the discarded savage value to the civilised? Biology offers one explanation which, for the sake of human faith and courage, had better be described as tentative, since it is a dismally cheerless one.

Kvflutiiui always offers ,1 higher and a lower road, one wliicli leads to an expanding and more complex nniit and one which degenerates .to a lower level.

J Where the higher road would lead to-day in the political groupings of mankind is in 110 doubt. As Professor Langdon Brown remarked, the normal and natural evolutionary process i.s always from the simple and partial structure to the larger whole. To-day it is towards a political fabric which must ultimately be coterminous with mankind. But. he adds, whole nations have abandoned that road. What is worse, but enormously significant, is that they are positively happy in abandoning it.

The.v actually seem to gam a new hope and a new ftiitli by departing from it. The new level Is more suitable to their evolutionary development, and they are more comfortable in it.

Professor Langdon Brown went on to speculate whether "material changes have perhaps outstripped the rate at which the rational powers ofi the highest levels of the brain can develop." Has the pace grown too hot? Are we grown tired of progress, as the megatherium grew tired, as Neanderthal man and the aboriginal Tasmanians grew tired? Or is it rather that, far from being too rapid, for the great majority even of civilised men, the rate of progress, of education, is not rapid enough? That question will remain to be answered.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19340215.2.42

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXV, Issue 39, 15 February 1934, Page 6

Word Count
341

BIOLOGY AND THE FUTURE. Auckland Star, Volume LXV, Issue 39, 15 February 1934, Page 6

BIOLOGY AND THE FUTURE. Auckland Star, Volume LXV, Issue 39, 15 February 1934, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert