Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SON'S SHARE.

ESTATE OF FATHER.

ADDITIONAL GRANT MADE.

HELP IN EARLIER YEARS. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) WELLINGTON,- Friday. In a written decision, Mr. Jueticc MacGregor made an order in the Supreme Court granting William Charles Livcrton, station hand, of l'akowai, an additional allowance of £l">0 a year, to be paid to him dining hits life by equal monthly payments, to form a charge on the net residue of hie father's estate. 1

This wae an application by the son under the Family Protection Act for better provision out of the estate of his father, William Alfred Liverton, sheep farmer, deceased, who left an estate valued at over £100,000. Eight counsel were briefed on behalf of various interests. It was stated for the trustees that they had decided simply to abide by tho judgment of the Court. They did not propose taking any active part in cither opposing or supporting the claim. His Honor said he had taken into jtecount the long and almost gratuitous assistance given by plaintiff to his father many years ago in building up the family estate, ae well as the probable loss by plaintiff in the near future of his present yearly wages and afeo an annuity, gratuitously given him out of a brother's estate. Counsel for plaintiff at tho Supreme Court hearing' said that testator died aged 91 years. The residue of the estate at present ivan £48,000, but on the death of testator's widow a further £28,000 would fall into residue. Plaintiff was Gl ycara of age. If he followed medical advice he would be thrown back on his income of approximately £140 a year, which he derived from a trust fund under the will. He had anuual expenses to meet for the maintenance of his only surviving son, and, provided the rate remained as at present, he had left a net income of about £100 out of the fund. It was also stated that testator married three times, and some of tho beneficiaries belonged to each of the three families.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19330610.2.162

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 135, 10 June 1933, Page 14

Word Count
336

SON'S SHARE. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 135, 10 June 1933, Page 14

SON'S SHARE. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 135, 10 June 1933, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert