Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STRUCK OUT.

GROCERY DISPUTE PARTIES. COUNCIL QUESTIONS ACTION. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) CHRISTCHURCH, Tuesday. The power of the conciliation commission to strike out parties to an application for hearing of an industrial dispute and to grant those parties: a separate hearing was discussed before a conciliation council yesterday, when C. J. Forbes and other employers in the grocery trade made application for a new agreement with the Grocers' Assistants' Union. The question arose when the commissioner, Mr. S. Ritchie, announced that at the request of the Canterbury Master Grocers' Union of Employers, representing nine, employers, he had struck those nine out of the general application of C. J. Forbes and others, and had appointed a separate day for the hearing of that case. The parties struck out were all grocers controlling big businesses, two of them being chain stores. Mr. D. I. Macdonald, appearing as agent for the Master Grocers' Union (the parties struck out), said there was no dispute in the terms of the Act. A citation had been isued by Forbes, but none of the principal applicants had been consulted. He maintained that the dispute was not a genuine one. Mr. Ritchie said the Act did not limit the number of industrial agreements that might exist in any one district at once, and it seemed to him that in natural justice other parties should be struck out from the present dispute and heard later. Mr. M. J. Riordan, assessor for the employers, said-that a clause in the Act under which the commissioner was using the power to strike out parties was intended only to allow the commissioner to strike out parties if they.were not engaged in the industry. Resolutions were carried by the council directing that the nine parties struck out be reinstated in the dispute, and that a case be stated to obtain the ruling of the Arbitration Court on the question of the commissioner's power to strike out parties.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19330426.2.41

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 96, 26 April 1933, Page 5

Word Count
322

STRUCK OUT. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 96, 26 April 1933, Page 5

STRUCK OUT. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 96, 26 April 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert