Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REMAND REFUSED.

CASE OF SOLICITOR.

counsel's insistent appeal

%TLY MAKING MYSELF ■■ CLEAR."

-An: insistent appeal. for. a..: further remand'in order that he might, prepare his case was made by Mr. J. J.. Sullivan, coiuwel -for Charles , Stewart Leahy, Solicitor,., when a number of charges of theft were : . preferred . against Leahy ■'• at the Police Court thie •! morning. ■ . • • ■.

Detective-Sergeant Kelly'. intimated that the police wished to , proceed: with One qf the charges, •' dealing with the alleged theft of £2 from F. J. Young, and Mr. Sullivan said that this case had been -firet- mentioned, only a week ago. The remand from last Thursday had not given him sufficient time to prepare his case. '.'■.■

Mr. ;W. R. McKean, 5.M..: I don't think. I. will decide to deal with it summarily,- in any case. . "

Mr, Sullivan contended that he was not asking anything unreasonable. He had not - taken the police by surprise.

Detective-Sergeant Kelly.retorted that thie was accused's fourth appearance before the Court. He was "very sorry indeed if Mr. Sullivan had another case ■to_ attend at the Supreme; - Court thie inorningj.but a.witness from Cape Colville ; had • been retained since • ■ last Thursday, and he desired to proceed with the? hearing. .

• During further argument Mr. McKean to]d Mr. Sullivan ■ that there was no necessity for him to get angry.

. Mr. Sullivan: I am not-angry; I am myself -clear. • There was no] notification of the' Young chapge unjtil Monday last./. Why .should cthe ch&rge be taken separately ?. .■„..

Mr, McKean said he intended that the «4e should go on to-day.

Sir. Sullivan: I ask respectfully to retire from t'ne caee. Hie Worship adjourned the hearing till this afternoon in view-of-.the. fact that counsel was engaged at the Supreme Conrt?tMs ■morning.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19321017.2.154

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXIII, Issue 246, 17 October 1932, Page 9

Word Count
283

REMAND REFUSED. Auckland Star, Volume LXIII, Issue 246, 17 October 1932, Page 9

REMAND REFUSED. Auckland Star, Volume LXIII, Issue 246, 17 October 1932, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert