Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PATIENT'S FATE.

NO RIGHT TO DECIDE. LONDON, September 12. Protests will be of no avail. If your doctor says that you must go to hospital to have your appendix removed you would be well advised to let him have the last word without any fuss. You may set rather a high value upon your appendix and you may not care for that particular hospital; indeed you may not have a kindly feeling for hospitals at all, and, if you must lose your appendix, you would rather have it done in the privacy of your home. That doesn't matter; the patient has no vote, according to Dr. R. Guthries, the East London coroner, who declared that if a doctor made up his mind to send a patient to hospital, the patient had no right to decide otherwise. If the doctor's instructions were ignored he ought to throw up the case.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19290919.2.51

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 222, 19 September 1929, Page 7

Word Count
149

PATIENT'S FATE. Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 222, 19 September 1929, Page 7

PATIENT'S FATE. Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 222, 19 September 1929, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert