Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE TORRINGTON CASE.

A PEER ACQUITTED. LONDON, October 23. Lord Torrington V been found not guilty on a charge of passing a valueless cheque. He stated in evidi-nce that he believed the cheque would be met by a lady friend paying in his allowance.— (A.* and X.Z. Cable.) It was alleged that Lord Torrington presented a cheque for £10, written on notepaper. upon a Nottingham bank, to Oliver, a chemist, at West Falling. Kent. Oliver, although suspectins the cheque'? validitiy. advanced £5. The bank dishonoured the cheque because Lord Torrington's monthly allowance of £2.5 had been stopped. 'Torrington did not reply to Oliver's request for an explanation. lutt anonymously sent a nionpy-order for £5 after proceedings had been institu'ed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19251024.2.74

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LVI, Issue 252, 24 October 1925, Page 9

Word Count
119

THE TORRINGTON CASE. Auckland Star, Volume LVI, Issue 252, 24 October 1925, Page 9

THE TORRINGTON CASE. Auckland Star, Volume LVI, Issue 252, 24 October 1925, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert