Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MOUAT CASE.

RELATIVE GIVES EVIDENCE. SOME PERSONAL DETAILS. STATEMENTS OF ACCUSED. t (3y Telegraph.—Press Association.! CHEISTCHUHCH, this day. 11 The Magistrate's Court was crowded s ! this morning when Frederick Peter c \ Mouat appeared on remand, charged c j with the murder of his wife, Nellie I Mouat, on or about February 20. " J John B. Merrett, a brother-in-law of 'I ; accused, and who is leaving New Zealand I shortly, gave evidence as to the married l " life of the Mouats. '" Witness said that Mrs. Mouat was his sister, and was born near Wanganui in c 1880. She married Mouat in 1910 in l ' England. Later they came to New c Zealand, then went to South Africa, returning to New Zealand in 1920 or *' 1921. Mouat was licensee of the Glenavy s Hotel for about a year. Witness visited the Mouats at Glenavy, and they appeared to be happy and doing well. ° After leaving the hotel they came to "• Christchurch. Witness last saw his sister on Sunday evening, February 15. a when she was at his house. She appeared r " quite happy. 1 Witness, continuing, said that at c Templeton in February he questioned 1 Mouat about his wife's disappearance. => Accused said he had no idea where she a had gone, though he had been instructed c by her that she would like to go to 1 Purakanui, and she asked him to bring 0 some clothes down. Mouat said he had 1 not been able to find his wife at Pura- ' kanui or Oamaru, so he left her clothes c with his mother. Witness asked Mouat 2 why a sheet and blankets had been " washed at Beckford Street on the morna ing of his wife's disappearance. Mouat 7 replied that his wife washed them, t Mouat admitted he was in financial " trouble. 1 The witness said that Mouat denied 3 that there had been any quarrel or that lie had struck his wife accidentally. I- Mr. Donnelly (Crown Prosecutor) ins timated, after Mouat had been remanded s for another week, that the case would i not be gone on with then, as there were - scientific investigations to be made. i

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19250318.2.95

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LVI, Issue 65, 18 March 1925, Page 8

Word Count
361

THE MOUAT CASE. Auckland Star, Volume LVI, Issue 65, 18 March 1925, Page 8

THE MOUAT CASE. Auckland Star, Volume LVI, Issue 65, 18 March 1925, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert