A DISPUTED AGREEMENT.

Auckland Star, Volume LII, Issue 59, 10 March 1921, Page 5

A DISPUTED AGREEMENT.

A ea.-e that came before Mr. J. W Povnton. S.M.. al i-.p Magistrate': Court arose out of a dispute regarding t sale of goods. Norman Levien I Mr •■ Quart!py.. manufacturers" agent, sued R 't \Y. Cuthbert i Mr. Wyatti. hotelkeeper =- of Helensville. to recover £1.") 14/, bal II ance allege! to be owing for goods sup if plied. is T'u- o\ Hence showed that defendan ■r had accepted and paid for part of certaii d goods ordered, but declined to pa\ fo i- the remainder. Defendant stated it wa k understood he could return the goods h> ie did not want. g His Worship said there was a conflje n of evidence as to what had taken pla when the agreement was maile. I: wa unusual for purchasers to return jmxiunless there was an arrangement per mitting that to be done. Mr. poyntoi said the onus was on the defendant V show that the usual procedure had beer varied by special agr-ement. It sale evident both parties .lid not understand is that goods could be returned, whatever ■c the plaintiff might have thought upon Is that matter. Judgment was for plaintiff for the amount claimed, with costs.