EADY V. EADY.
. TRADE NAME DISPUTE. Judgment was given yesterday afternoon by Mr. Justice Cooper in the action in which A. Eady and Company, music sellers, sought an injunction restraining Louis R. Eady and Son. Ltd., piano iraporterSj from using the name " Eady'e," " £ady and Company," or any other name so similar thereto as to be calculated to deceive the public. His Honor said that the defendant comparry was entitled to use the name of " Louis R. Eady and Son, Ltd, , ' but it also claimed to be en-titled to use the name "'Eady'a." In his Honor's opinion, it.he plaintiff company was entitled to an I injunction restraining the defendant company from the use of the word "'Eady's," Costs of action were given against the defendant company.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19200504.2.65
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LI, Issue 105, 4 May 1920, Page 5
Word Count
126EADY V. EADY. Auckland Star, Volume LI, Issue 105, 4 May 1920, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in