Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

J THE CRIMINAL CAXIENDAR. i AiTIVK IURdLARY ALLKOEU A i,.r:nid.i.,:- -;:in_- of charj»o« wje "liriiUtiiil a pri.uuer named Arthur ,Jl:i'nilton. uiin .ils.i apparently at «diuilim- or iiilii-r hud gone under about 'hrill a >>..•■/< ii ..I'.-.-,•-. among others Dij'm . .■-:>,•. I'owe'.l. and Murphy. >le w.i-. with honsobreakinj. 'lii.-lt. rii-t-ivina -tolen <rood>. and witli 'hii\in;i li,M!-e)nr.ikiii_' implement-, "i-'.it!----jllut re|,|-e-rnt>-d by L-ounsel, and In; j pleaded m>: jruilty "to all charges. |' The i ronii r-nis.-.-iitiir fllon. .1. A. I Tut.-. K.I .i explained to the jury tii.it there were Muenteen riiarrc? in ..II airain-t the pri-i-ner. iiu-luililij ei-'lit i'!ur;r- lit iuir.'i.iry. three n! houseiireakilii- ar-iivities liad extended nvi r a period from duly r,f la-t year until April of thl\ear. lv .liil\ uf last joar •> numbi-r of Chinamen's I -e> in and alwtn the i-ity were ran-a. -ked duiin- the alisetlee of ■ tiieir owner- in the daytime. In Ortoher about Cl'-'"> uorth o: jew.-llrr.v was stolen from tin- -hop "I i Mr. Stran-iln-rs. « .-e.-.>iidii.iud denier. w!,,-e safe luid licou blown open. In several in-'.-.tjliees the breaking and '-nwrinj; had. ; lie,-u attended in- llio blowinj! open of I the safe.-. When prisoner was arrested iin April la-t nun h of the property which 'had been report.-l mi-.-i.ii.' wa- found in Ibis pos.-i--iuii. Jle Imd admitted at, least that lie wa.- ill posse-niiin nf wimo proIpprty which lie knew wa« -i.ileu |imjperty. Whea hi. liox.-- -'~-re i.eiir.' span.lieil by the police lie had warned them of the pre-eiiee of ill one. ; l-'u.-e of the kind found in his possession μ-otihl not he obtained anywhere in Au.-k----iland. an.l ua- similar to the pier-es found latter the tmrplary at StranberjV. A con-'-ider.ible nuniher of fkeieton key- and . hoiLaebrPakini: tools had also been louti'l Jin the prisoner , * possession.

A FIRE AND ITS RESULT. INSCRAXCK CLAIM F.EFITKU. Mi- Uonnr Mr Justice Cooper heard tin' .-nit brought by Xickle ttros., fiirmeivi near Cambridge, again-t the Liverpool and l-omlon aud Glebe Insiirlanee Co.. f»r the n-'-ovcry of AI4OO iti-j-iiniu.p money. ! Mr A. M. tlnulrl appeared for i Uaa-.'. William, ii'.ut Kdwin Niokle irarryjiii X ~;, lm-ine.- «s Xkkle Uros.i. an I I .Mr I-:. Ma ; iony appeared for the ln«ur- ] The plaintiff*, it wa« explained, were 'owner- »l 1"- arc- at Pukckura. Waipii, and• v detached building at their farm. ! nc.-.ipir.l liy t!io Pukekura Training iSr'iool,' , «a# by tiro on Deeenv jbor S\. I'.M-J. Th." hn-'ldmg hail Uo,-i, i in.-iiri-d ill t":ic ileieudant I nlfit-D fnr C4OH. Thi- plaintiffs statd Ithat their 10-vi h?.d bwn £3.150 an:l lipw.ird-. oii.l i-laimi-d t!-.;:t tl\ey had fulj tilled all Uie conditions of thr- :n-iir-laiiiv polity, and «ere entitled to roc-oive the ruiii i)i C4(MI ir'-'.m the company. j Thr dei'i'ini' -<-t up by the insaran — I nmnaiiv I'.micd that the condition n: the poli.-y a- t.i the jiving of imtirp had j 1....-M .-•mi-liej witli by tho plaintilis. jT'ie inin;iaiiy [iirtlier stated that. c\e:i lit tin . Court rnleil that the term* >>' r t\\o jinlii'V iin t . the ftLving of nntiee jlial lift-n i-umplicil with, the <!a.ini wns i ipje.'t«'d by tin , ( nnipanr on -hino 7, I ] it 1 :{. and as no a.-tion \va= coniineneed I within threi' ni'Mith" of ?ueh r-jection. jail bpnetlit uniler tin; policy »a< for- ; IX-riSAVCK (I.AI.Nf REFI'TKT). 1 Formal i-rilHif fur the <!aini .'.. - -; Xi-\illi. ' Ni>w:-om!H>. Thf iHlter -tale.i thai in a.T(- til" tli" property ami t!ic li.i-l lii-i-n put into'hin liainU ;.ir -:t\r at L'o-iin. With {'■.<■ lan i I valued .'t L-."i an ikiv. thai tneanl tliat Til , .' .'. 'i ii |irii;ti-rt\ iiad been ■'V c:i.n7.*i, vvli::-!i u:i.v a u-ondi>ri'nl I'.nr- : p.ihi. II- .-: : !. i..- I t> laliie ~; r'iliiii;,i::i::. a. bi-t'.vpi-;] LJ.-">IXI :i :i.l v- it'll. I; v.a- ini-ntiimrd in pvideniv. tiiat Hi" l>uil.!;ua-i h< rr covered by i■. , pollenw for 'J].. _ )(i(i a n 4 L'.".iKi. ni?;i,> jliveiy. in Ihe Stanciard ortit-e. and mi' nlbcr pnlit-y in;- C4HO j u the l/\ •■-. ••! Illli'l 1.-.l !'IM ;:;,:! Ciulip oflic. il'ra.erdinj.l

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19140527.2.47

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XLV, Issue 125, 27 May 1914, Page 5

Word Count
647

SUPREME COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XLV, Issue 125, 27 May 1914, Page 5

SUPREME COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XLV, Issue 125, 27 May 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert