S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XLIV, Issue 49, 26 February 1913, Page 11

S.M. COURT.

. j (Eefi.re Mr L". C. Kettle. S.M. I" N DEFEND ED CASES. Jndj;nie::t was iive:i for the plaiutiffs in the following undefended rases:—.lames S. Wiis,::, f Mauley rluini £1 l"i : W. <:. i:-js>eit v. \\.' Hi-nure. £<< :»■'«: Srinonds and Lee v. F. L. CI T. ; Auckland lioUerniakcrs' I'ulou v. \\ . Seaiit-r. 0 ; A. E. Macartney v. \Y. Conlson, £1 13/: 1". K. Grnsrinc v. B. Irwico. £ln 4/: L>. <;oldie and Sons, Ltd.. v. l-\ (.'. Tbiiiuvioou. £4 1/4: Mrs l>. Cnntts v. J. Marriott, £J 11. ti: -T. l>. Roberts v. (;. L«:ie :'.nd fOU U, : Eaton liros. v. J. Drinnan. £1.1 i> C: A. M. Patterson v. M. Dllley, IT, :\ :); executors of lioliert Kew v. lliijrli MrKenzie, £~> 5/10; Kauri Tluiber Co. v. F ; ddy and Ueorse, il I" II: Hubert r.riefault v.'j. %olant. £: 3/: Staim-laus s. I'.eruanli v. John S. Cnldwell, fl L ; Ucardiaii Trust io. v. c. Kdserumbe. il'- , 1 1; t'rah; and Sharp v. K. (.:arlquist, » «: G. Kronfeld v. I. T. T.int. £6 12/0: H. il. Suiwtou. Ltd. v. Mrs U. (J'K&rfu, £i> i -!; t>. lioldie aud Sons. Ltd. v. J. TV". SomervelL juu. 11 2: \V. Uead t. George i-'tott. il 10 : M. r.umett r. Alfred Cook. £T> 13 : Katcn Bros. v. J. Sk--ates. £1 T/D; Hill cad Hummer v. c. I.psUe. £40 11/S: Jobn Burns and Co.. Ltd. v. P. Donovan, £3 12/1: I:. H. liopkina v. A. Klenner, £36 IL'/l: Heather, Koberton, I.cd. v. A. J. Thoruurn. fS l.'a: Auckland Meat Co. T. Benj;unin Koylo. £2 14.4: H. l>. Bedford v. Charles H. Irvine. £4 1J T: (iuardian Tmst v. W. 'albert. £4 i: S: Briscoe and Co., Ltd. t. "iitelaw and Cleary, £10 11 7.