Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

Some peculiar positions sometimes come to the surface at meetings of Land Boards. At the last meeting of the Wellington Board, the ranger reported that a married <woman had failed to reside on a section which she had taken up. Instead, she was living with her husband, also a Crown tenant, on a section some distance away. Neither party could live with the other, and yet retain the land left vacant. To retain both sections the coirple would have to live apart. The Commissioner remarked that the lady should not have taken up the section in the first place. A member of the Board said he thought she would forfeit the land rather than her husband. The Board decided to ask her to show cause -why the lease should not be forfeited.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19130204.2.50.2

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XLIV, Issue 30, 4 February 1913, Page 6

Word Count
132

Page 6 Advertisements Column 2 Auckland Star, Volume XLIV, Issue 30, 4 February 1913, Page 6

Page 6 Advertisements Column 2 Auckland Star, Volume XLIV, Issue 30, 4 February 1913, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert