PLACE OF TRIAL.
I . I A TEST CASE. J I (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) WELLINGTON", Friday. i I The Full Court i* sitting this alter-I coon to hear argument ill two cases, [Scot; v. G'allaher, and E. Mersar and J Company v. Welsh. The question is a3 to the, true interpretation of Rule 7 of I 'the Supreme Court code, which states |. .that where there are fittings of the 1 Supreme Court held in more than one [town in the same judicial district, the place of trial should be the town "most convenient to the residence of the defendant."' : Upon the answer to this question depends the place of trial lor Supreme !Court actions coaling from many towns r.onh of Martotu, on the Main Trunk ■ lint-, the que3tion being- whether actions should be tried at Wanganni or Pahnerton North. j In the first case L. Ccrhen appears tor the plaintiff, and W- H. D. Bell for ■the defendant. In the second case C. CL, Hniiqa appeals for the A. R. Meek for the defendant. The, fiffaiic4rerenia4iite=&3MoiL-
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19120727.2.24
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XLIII, Issue 179, 27 July 1912, Page 5
Word Count
175PLACE OF TRIAL. Auckland Star, Volume XLIII, Issue 179, 27 July 1912, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in