S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXIX, Issue 8, 9 January 1908, Page 2

S.M. COURT.

THIS DAY. (Before Mr C. C. Kettle, S.M.) Judgment was glveu by default in the following cases;—M. O'Connor v. A McKinley | (Ohura), £20 10/, costs £4 16/; Tattersneld | ! and Co. v. D. Fisher (Eliersliej, £3 4/4, costs 12/; L. C. Ghiespie and Sous v. W. Low tßirkenh-ad), £9 10/7, costs £2 16/; W. J. Maxwell v. Andrew Notcou, £_ 13/, costs I_/; j_r_es Stevens v. Alfred Dare, b/0, costs b/; D. Hay and Sons v. Heci»ir Sutherland iFapuroaj, £3 14/, costs £1; R. Salmon and Son v. Alfred Dare, 10/, costs 6/; A. Cleave and Co., Ltd. v. N. McLeod j Smith (Ct_.-isteln_.-ch), £2 0/6, costs 10/; A. Cleave and Co., Did. v. Fred. Beard iPetone), £2 0/6, costs 10/; A. Cleave and I Co., Ltd. v. I. McFadden (Hampden;, £1 I 10/3, costs 5/; C, H. Furness aud Co., Ltd. v. L. Anuear (Pieton). is 17/9, costs £1 3/t>; ] A. Cleave and Co., Ltd. v. Duucau Holmes j tilatatir-jj, _.l l/u, costs 5/; Tattersfjeld and | Co. v. Wilfred Auckraxu lOtahuhuj, £2 7/10, ! costs 10/; A. Cleave and Co., Ltd. v. Frank I 11. Fearn, 11/6, costs 6/: Auckland Provia- ( ciai School Commissioners v. R K. C. Bainbridge iTe Kupuru), £32, costs £2 14/; C. 1 Bird y. George Powell, IS/, costs 5/; W. S winner-ton v. A Harper, A' 7 11/, costs £1 3/6; j. Neweil v. Tom Albert, £1 S/6. costs j ±:l 17/0, and possession ; William Spencer Whitjey v. James Montgomery, £16 12/2, cosuS £1 11/6; E. V. Miner tChelieaj v. J. Dougan, _;2 -L/ 3. costs 10/; Luck, Upton, Ltd. t,ui liquidation) v. l'ene Pomare (Wharapa, Hoki-uga;, £5 1/, costs £1' 7/6; J. Wiseman and Sous, Ltd., v. R. R. Bainbridge tie Kopuruj, £10 4/9, costs £2 3/e; J. Wiseman aud Sous, Ltd., v. D. Murray cStratiurdj. iil 9/, costs 5/; W. J. Maxwell v. Otto iitzinxmons, £1 5/, costs 6/; Bond Bios. v. Jane Soiloway iKakahi), £__ 17/6, costs £3 6/ (.subject to defendant's right to apply for reheariug); L. N. iieuth v. A. A. Yv'iiipp, £o 10' costs £1 3/6. A Promissory Case.-—F. W. Hunt, storekeeper ol AucKland, claimed from W. li. Wright the sum of £30 V, -mount of promissory note due. Mr. Buddie appear-ed for piamtia', and Mr. Ail-on tor deieudaat. The suiteiiiout of ciaitu aiicged that defendant had made out a protui-sory note for £30 on 19th August iasi, paja_;e three months afterwards, and which had not been so paid- Alter hearing evidence for both parties, his V, o>-.suip gave judgment for plaintiff ior amount claimed, with costs, £i 19/.