Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RE ENGINEERS' DISPUTE.

(To the Editor.) Sir, —As one of the employers' representatives before the Court of Arbitration on Thursday last, when the engineers' dispute was being dealt with, I desire to explain that what Mr Masefield and the employers wished to imp' 3 upon the Court was the fact that, in their opinion, there was only one in ten of their employees in the engineering department competent to receive the minimum wage demanded by the union, namely, 11/ per day.-—I am, etc., CHAS. GROSVENORSecretary, Auckland Provincial Employers' Association.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19071029.2.93.2

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 258, 29 October 1907, Page 6

Word Count
89

RE ENGINEERS' DISPUTE. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 258, 29 October 1907, Page 6

RE ENGINEERS' DISPUTE. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 258, 29 October 1907, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert