Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GAOL OR HOSPITAL?

A DEPARTiIEXTAL QUESTION. (By Telegraph.—Press Association- 4 WELLINGTON, Thursday. b< There has been a stir in Blenheim concerning- a prisoner "who was sent {j from the tree-planting prison camp at It Dimijrree for treatment at the Wairau ai Hospital. It seems that a man named *' Allan, who \v.as serving at Dumgree a bi sentence for forgery, became ill with si typhoid -and -was sent to Be treated at F"j Blenheim, where, under the care of Dr. ! Bennett, he recovered and was diseharg- jot ed from the hospital. According to the oi Marlborongh " Herald" the doctor then ™ notified the authorities, and a.sked them to take the prisoner back. They re- : plied that they had nothing to do "with him, as he was under the supervision of I tI the Wellington authorities. The lat-L m ter. when appealed to. seemed doubtful jtl ! as to their position in the matter, and j gave no indication of the proper place toLjj apply. Meanwhile the convict took bi full advantage of the (to him) delight- jtl ful uncertainty of the authorities on ™ his case, and gallivanted round the o - town. The doctor, being unable to treat ci him otherwise than as a patient, is un- j sl able to put any check on the trouble- :gj some inmate, whom he considers to be Ile the victim of delusions. In the course v of the article it was alleged that the " : prisoner had bepn in communication jfi 1 with the Minister of Justice (Hon. Mr. p I Me(fowan). who, contrary to precedent *f ! and policy, replied to him instead of „ directing him to apply to the prison ii authorities. " " sl [« When this extraordinary charge was ? j brought under the notiep of Mr. Mc- n Gowan by a "Post" reporter, the lat- | ter learned that Allan had bepn petition- I I ing for a remission of sentence, and that fi • recently a, telegram nmc from Blen- a : hpira on the matter, the Minister think-!?. I in? it had come by permission of Dr. i n I Bennett, who was tcchniciilly Allan's i ■ gaoler while he was in the hospital. t: I nn answer to the doc-tor. There jf, was no truth in the assertion that the ■* Minister had replied direct to Allan. t: j The telegram* were ns foll-nvs • —"To ' the AUnntir for Justin, Wellington. |" fit for discharge from hospital. If c petition of no offpet. cmh] you .shift '' Ime at oncp. Signed. Allan."" A reply I F Iby the Minister was sent in th- follow- ll ing terms to Dr. Bennett: -Wairau U ■Hospital. Pteawe inform prisoner VI- j b [lan that his petition will rp-eive con- !i; : eideration when the Dppnrtment re- '[ ;reivps otficial notitii-Btion that hp is fit ;to leave the linsuiial. also that lxis I „ removal from rhr ho-pilul must depend c upon the same thing. FTT-s cmnmnni- , cations should be sent to the Inspector jot" Prisoners. I-Signed i James Mc- d Uowan." P The Minister explained thnt vrhen a ( prisoner >enr to the hospital he c was in charge of the hospital people ' i until better, and when he was better it I a . i wai< the duty of thp hospital authori- j , i ties to !et the Prisons Department is I know, and to retain their patient until j - he could be tnken over. When a pris- r loner was in tho hospital he was ont [ lof i-xistence for the time being so far las serving a sentence was concerned. tho-tigh afterwards the Crown might ] reconimend that the time spent in bos- j i i pital should be coJinf.ed ;i.s time served, j 1 lilt was this nile that was responsible • ! for the petition mentioned in Allan's Ji ! telegram quoted above.) The >rini~ter \v:\<; not preparoci to ' I rlisni.e.-i the ~tate of aff'a-irs that led to ( Allans beinji at lar-rp in Blenheim, .' . 'when he sboulu have been still in cUS- ' tody, but from remarks made by an loffic'ial connei ted with thp Department , j tile reporter gathered that there bad , been no remission so far as Wellington • i was concerned. ! To clear thp matter up application , I was made to Col. Hume. Inspector of, - 'Prisons. Col. Hume said that the notii 11.-ation from tho hospital doctor to the gaoler at. Dumgree that Allan was b<Utcr and lit for removal was dated j 17th March (Saturday last). the gaoler g<>t in on the 18th. and on the 20th it reached Col. Hump. The same day a warder went, over from •Welling- - tun to Blenheim for Allan, and he is expected to return to Wellington with. his prisoner by to-day's steamer. It is reported that. Allan's sentence wonM hays been fully served ere now but for his illness, anil it is possible that the misunderstanding at Blenheim has been : due to dubiousness on the parr of some--5 body as to whether the sentence still - ran oil, not at the time of Allan's discharge from the hospital. r ——— ——

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19060323.2.29

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 71, 23 March 1906, Page 3

Word Count
827

GAOL OR HOSPITAL? Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 71, 23 March 1906, Page 3

GAOL OR HOSPITAL? Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 71, 23 March 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert