Page 3 Advertisements Column 1

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 138, 10 June 1905, Page 3

Of\u T ] \V iy ' *'"' FU,I V,mri Bc '"f'' " The attorney had been oiled to answer atlidavit.s at the instanc, of wa .Ux, Instituto uf Xew South Wales. *« if 1 , 0 ? 11 "" il f rrtinst lIK respondent Cm a '• |leijl - i" order to pre£l- bt>il '- seized l!v ». 2> had written v lettor 1,,,, w «, re d BMtU« « neidcri!d au improper augJ» (the client) wants t o pmtrrt these jujjiUr Bheep. if poKrihic. and 1,0 J • -nhrtltuta fur tho £200 uorW *«nte no further rnnncv from ymi." ttmiir ÜBtfie Ow,MK Ml - :i "-i'" <•"'"•» tlietTu" Justice frini! wereull uf ouiniim » H:rowa.s ll ,,eorn ll ,i llio (ivc ou the OwL , C '■ ,:s i'"" tl «'i- but Mr. Justice Jjon and Mr. Justin Prin X wcw of .J'VPmion. looking ~i It from the point lhat r°' a solicit "i- iidvising his client. Vise thaf 8 U , most *W"S t» admv<m ( a bo e' l:£ murtjmgfi ohnuld be » ! dfr 2? Wy P u n>°*e. *»d thouphL th.it. IT n ?? that ""eepondent should mere 4i l uosts uf tho application to«P Tr 1 suffl ciently penalise the uth t2' V ' lustict! Cohen, while strongreprobating the conduct of the attrofrTu^ ÜB,dmd that, ftS there was no SffS/u 0 ' be,,u cd on h y u ™»*- ---ol th dltcir - *» order to puy the costs a,,J! c P'°«edings would Lave met the ffl «!te of the case. «n?0M lke T 9|d, Ja P Gilks 9 * d » all ct>l - -in all ,i np silks 9 ? d ' Ja P si^ 3 9 * d > Court"a 9jd; nffw showing »t J" 1 " , iioceti-strcet.—-Ad.