Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RE CITY ABATTOIRS

(To the Editor.) Sir,—During this last few months I have carefully watched the City Council's action in regard to the removal of the abattoirs, and have come to the conclusion that at least one member of the Council has an axe to grind. Since we have a majority of councillors who appear to be working- in the interest of the general public, the time is ripe for the pnblic to move in the matter. Several reasons are put forward in support of the removal of the abattoirs, but none of them will hold water. First, Sir, there is the alleged contamination of the Auckland water supply. Since the closing of the piggery no drainage flows towards the spring; even though the piggery and yards drained in that direction, it is impossible for the drainage .to soak into the spring, as there is an intervening and never-failing creek, sometimes a chain wide, being the drainage from Symonds-street Cemetery, Kingsland, Newton, and Archhill, augmented by the overflow from the sn/ring in question. This creek is 10 or 12ft below the level of the spring, and is from two to five chains away from the edge of the spring, which is encased by a wall of puddled clay. Is it possible for the abattoir drainage to cross a creek and soak up J hill for several chains and finally do more than the inside pressure can do, viz., percolate puddled clay? For 25 years these abattoirs have been in use, and have not contaminated the water supply. Why so now? The water is more likely to be contaminated through Mount Albert sewerage than from any other source. In regard to travelling- stock, all stock should be compelled to be yarded by 7 a.m. If new saleyards are required, there is an ideal spot close to the abattoirs, also close to the railway. As for the "extension of Auckland," the abattoirs cannot possibly retard this as they are in the heart of f ellmongery tannery, and boiling-down establishments. But, Sir, the extension of the city must eventually close the spring's for domestic purposes. Are the people of Auckland going to pay another half-penny per pound for their meat without nrotest? The Minister for Agriculture should be approached on the matter with a view to having- the old site retained. The present site is one of the best in the colony. With modern buildings and proper pianagement, the Auckland City Abattoirs would be. a credit to all concerned. I admit they are at present a disgrace to even a sleeping community.—l am, etc., ROBERT M. GILLESPIE. Grey Lynn, January 17, 1903.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19030121.2.65.41

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXIV, Issue 18, 21 January 1903, Page 2 (Supplement)

Word Count
439

RE CITY ABATTOIRS Auckland Star, Volume XXXIV, Issue 18, 21 January 1903, Page 2 (Supplement)

RE CITY ABATTOIRS Auckland Star, Volume XXXIV, Issue 18, 21 January 1903, Page 2 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert