Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LICENSING CASE.

INFORMATIONS DISMISSED,

Mr T. Hutchison, S.M., gave judgment to-day in the informations

against Syme, licensee of the Star | Hotel,. Otahuhu, heard on December 11 19. His Worship said that there were I two informations against defendant, |i who was charged respectively with ft

exposing liquor for sale and keeping ;| the hotel open lor the sale of liquor on Sunday, November 10. The important facts were that two travellers from Auckland and a local resident > entered the hotel by the side door,, 1 | which was open. One of the Auck- .j| land men was served with a glass of" | beer on the order of the otiier, but no other drinks were served, probably because just then Constable; f| Foreman entered. All the men in s the hotel, with the one exception, J were persons to whom defendant J ruign* lawfully .supply liquor, and for | this purpose fie migut open his bar r; and expose his liquor without com- f nutting- a breach of the Act. The question was therefore whether I liquor was exposed for sale to the j witness Lockhart, of Otahuhu, who" ~'% entered with the travellers. Whatever his intention, no drink had been 1 asked for or by him, and there was 3 evidence that he had been denied :| drink on a former occasion. The '■.% mere presence of a man in the house § was insufficient to base an inference that he could have drink for the ask- S ing. The surrounding circumstances | in this case were undoubtedly sus- f picious, but not a suspicion which fjj was necessary to the only important 1 conclusion that Lockhart was-in the if way of getting drink. It might be !; said in a general way that the fact of a man going into a hotel for tne purpose of getting a drink was some . evidence that he could get it, but it. seemed wholly" unreasonable to impute his expectation to any proof *"\ that the hotelkeeper would sell to him. The case must depend on other and surrounding circumstances, and in this case they did not appear to :"i him to form any safe basis upon M which, to found a conclusion adverse . to the defendant. The information -■ ' for exposing liquor for sale there- 3 | fore failed, and the other alternative . j; information failed with it. '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19020108.2.40

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXIII, Issue 6, 8 January 1902, Page 4

Word Count
384

LICENSING CASE. Auckland Star, Volume XXXIII, Issue 6, 8 January 1902, Page 4

LICENSING CASE. Auckland Star, Volume XXXIII, Issue 6, 8 January 1902, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert