Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

In the matter of the Native Lancl Court Act, 1894, and of an appeal b$ the Hauraki Sawmill Co. from thai decision of the Native Land Court, on an application for confirmation of an alienation of part of Tahanui No. 2, a ease was stated for the opinion of the' Supreme Court yesterday. Mr Earl, instructed by Messrs Miller and Son, appeared to argue the. case for the appellant company. Counsel traced the history of the native land legislation from 3 873 (o IS9_, and quoted ir_ re the Pohatikotiko Block. 17, N.Z. L.R.. 131, aud in re the Whakakoroi Eloek, IS, N.Z.L.R., 097. The point its question was whether a deed of alie-. nation signed by less than the wholflj of the owners of customary land ii. capable of confirmation under th_ Native Land Court Act, 1594. His Honor after hearing argument reserve ed judgment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19010628.2.42

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 152, 28 June 1901, Page 3

Word Count
148

SUPREME COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 152, 28 June 1901, Page 3

SUPREME COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 152, 28 June 1901, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert