CORRESPONDENCE.

Auckland Star, Volume XXIX, Issue 22, 27 January 1898, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE.

INJUSTICE TO FARMERS,

(To the Editor.)

Sir,—The late Henry George in his workon single tax lays it down " That the land is the source from which all wealth is derived." Then it seems tome that the farmer, or those employed in extracting that wealth from the land, are justly entitled to protection equally with the other trades and callings employed in the cities. The cause of neglect and injustice to the farmer arises from, the fact that there is no combination amongst them of the nature of trade unions in the cities, where the combined vote procures everything. The farmer and landowner are not only the most numerous class, but more numerous than all other classes combined, and yet for want of this combination they are neglected by the Government, and most shamefully robbed of the fruits of their labour. The farmers' produce is so manipulated and goes through so many hands that but a very small mite reaches the unfortunate grower's, pocket. When he sends his fat beef and mutton to market, he finds that from a combination amongst butchers there is no competition for his produce. One or perhaps two butchers buy for all, or set the prices. When he sends his wool to the sale it is the same thing. One firm sets the price, and there is in reality no competition. As a proof of this examine and compare the sale list of the Australian wool sales and those of Auckland, as given in the public press of both countries. These and such like are the evils the farmer lias to bear. Will the Government see to. it that the farmer is protected equally with the trades unions in the cities, or will they turn their backs to the interests of ike chief of all the industries.—Yours, etc,.

Farmer.,