R.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 271, 17 November 1887, Page 5

R.M. COURT.

Ufhis ©ay.

(Before Mr H. G. Seth Smith, R.M.)

UNDEFENDED CASKS. JUDGMENT went by default in the following cases :-J. Stonehara v. W. G. Parker, claim £19 6s Id ; costs £2 12s. M. Roth v E. Good, claim £52; judgment for £1 10s ; cost £16 4s. A. Eady v. R. W. Parkinson, claim £9 18s ; costs £1 17s. G. W. Binney v. L. Reisteren, claim £18 2s sd; costs £1 6s. R. Hayman and Co. v. H. J. Honevlield, claim £9 7s 9d; costs 16s. McLeod Brothers v. J. Hay, claim £1 8s 6a : costs £1 7s 6d. R. Baxter v. Catherine Campbell, claim £2 ; costs £1 Is 6d. F Taylor v. R. Wood, claim 15s ; costs £1 Is 6d. E. G. l>. Green v. Higgens, claim £7 7s 6d ; costs £1 16s. J. Letham v G. Sampson, claim. £3 18s 5cJ ; cost ,£l Is 6d Peel and Thompson v. H. Kelly, claim £3 Us 6d; costs £1 Is 6d J. Booth v. Captain Oakes, claim £1 lbs; costs £1 Is 6d. C. F. Griffiths v. J. B. Lockhart, claim £1 Is ; costs 11s. DEFENDED CASES.

K. R. Andrews v. S. A. CiUPMAJr.— Summons to tenant holding over.—Defendant was ordered to give up possession on the 19th November.-Costs ±1 17s Id were allowed.—Air Brock appeared for the kLh* v. A. WKioirr.-Claim £10, for damages resulting from a col won.-: Sir Theo. Cooner appeared for the plaintiff and Mr J A Tole for the defendant.-Lvidence was given relative to the accident, ami also as to the extent of the damages resulting. A number of witnesses were examined on eifchei side. The evidence disclosed that The colision resulted in smashmg he cart and horses, also a verandah post and a Sea anh pole. The various witnesses gave very conflicting evidence. Witnesses for the defence were still being examined as we went to press. - ;

Liddv, the enterprising and indefatigable manager for >he Ma,eroms has taken a shop in the Victoria Arcade and fitted it up with a ilendkl collection of photographs and naint in-s of Sign or and Signora Majeroa. It numerous impersonation,. The place was for the forthcoming iween,