Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PERFUMERY RECIPEBOOK.

(To the Editor.) era-Some little time ago considerable prominence was given in your columns to an action, Pieese v. Barnett, wherein the plaintiff sued criminally fep the recovery of a certain formula book, &c. Mr Piesse was at the time, and previously thereto, unuu. engagement to us to manufacture perfumes, and our name appeared in the matter Although no evidence was produced that wo had anything to gain by the successful issue of the caso, tho presiding justice thought fit to assume that we had, and availed himself of his brief authority to pass certain remarks reflecting discredit on our firm. The case was quasheri, but Mr Piesse immediately afterwards instituted • civil proceedings for the recovery of his goods. We, trusting that the matter might still bo fully ventilated in CouU't, refrained from engaging in » wordy warfo.ro in the newspapers, more espe-cialiy a 9 in common justice to both parties, wo considered that no action to influence cither one way or the other should bo taken before the caso was heard. Mr .barnett, however, in the meantime, ietfc Auckland before the civil writ coula tie served. As the affair died a natural death, we simply allowed it to drop, and for our part would have been content to > .consign it to a merciful oblivion, particu- j ferly°as the slanderous report_ obtained little or no credence from our clients. In fact, our known standing enabled us to safely treat the calumnies with contempt. By last 'Frisco mail, however, we notice that fcho caso has attracted attention m tho leading English Drug paper, " Ihe ChomißtJ and Druggist/ of October Ist, a copy of which wo .forward tor your perusal. It must be evident to all that Messrs Piesse and Lubin were the parties most interested in tho matticr, and you will observe that they speak of our conduct as fair and straightforward. As we havo not written them on tho subject, their statement may be regarded as strictly impartial. Wo presume that they heard from their late partner and other relations in the colony, as well as from Mr Barnett and hiss friends. Let us add that wo could, at any time, havo disproved any personal object to be gained if Mr Piesse had succeeded in recovering possession of tho book, as, from tho very commencement of that gentleman's engagement, wo were in possession of conies of all the principal formula?; and we afso wish to say that an entirely fictitious value has been attached to the book, as in tho hands of any but an experienced and practical man liko Mr Picsao it would bo comparatively useless.—Wβ are, dear air, yours faithfully, Shari,a.m> & Co.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18871114.2.5.2

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 268, 14 November 1887, Page 2

Word Count
446

THE PERFUMERY RECIPEBOOK. Auckland Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 268, 14 November 1887, Page 2

THE PERFUMERY RECIPEBOOK. Auckland Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 268, 14 November 1887, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert