RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

Auckland Star, Volume XVII, Issue 36, 12 February 1886, Page 4

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

(Before Mr H. G. Both B_ lt4) R.!li I In the following cfls«sjtidmn^lr_' plaintiffs with coßts:-Holt and rw^ll £10 7s id, costs £3. J. wueon ?*£?s& £12 2s 6d. Mr Cotter had Wptfvd »_M the amount; coats £2 7s,■ 0,-,U__3li Kendolf, £2 ss, balance ot oloiuT^U coßrs£ll7s. J.W.Cour_wv»l«e' £19 10a. promissory noto. And _fi3£*«sl It. Noal v. Mary Friend, 'SmCTJ_SB piled ; Mr Frank Rowe •moved•L_N* Hugh Gordon v. John J&CdnJ&f&H ooßts £1 16s. Louis Moses V eW»I 10s, promissory note; coata W^FSSfI Thomas Surman, £9 3a i coats lfa *!W\ JUDSMENT SUMMOHS,,/^ Dutton and Cock v. Henderson -j>i. ' Mr Earl for creditors.-Orderedl&l__ equal instalmeets within a mbntviwi 11? In imprisonment. •'■■■ vITaSSiM R. J. Clavell v. Hi Dloksonjrffl __fi_i f n e^ t tor oredltor.-AlluwMl4jy|SffiS K. B-Brett v.Mary Moore: c_i-„„ ' grocerioß.-Mr Jaokßon Patam.toj._J2S Order, ssper week. ,-.,.,, /PHR W. R. Palmer v. WUHamNnrV-,. £3 103 2d.-Mr Burton tor credltlS-Jfc denied the debt, but afterw_4»™__fflwi by two inst_lmonts.-Orderacori^K'P| JtmOMßMT.i^.'i.j**Hewitt v. Coombea.-01al_;!iiiM,..-particulars of thU claim have alnX_Tl» Hstaod.-The plaintiff, Frank H««ffi_» Sanraol Coombes £.15 12s, ODminiHaHi of clothing at New Ply_os__£_£ branch establishments. - His )\vHfi ** Into the details, and cons Wared _?_• tiff had not mado oat his c^ifirKZ accepted a nonsuit, conts, ffl'&^fiHsSf VV, Brlerley v. W. Blewdß__oiaiin it Mr Brookfleld for plaintiff, Mr Tnei_S_ defendant.—Judgment for plaintiff hfrt? costs, £1 3s. " ,T' " ~^sfffl| A. S. Ford v. J. A]leri.-irjla!m, !W_S ment ro&orved. t*W