RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

Auckland Star, Volume XXVI, Issue 4418, 11 July 1884, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

(Before It. O. Scth Smith, Esq., R.M.) ITTOEFENDEO CASKS. IN Ihe following cases judgments for plaintiff", wnro entered :--w. J. Napier v. Daniel Kstalls £2 2s. -usta 15h ; John Alibolt v. U. A. Martin, £25 lis Gil, costs _l 18s; Harcourt and Co. v. Watson and Co., £17 A . costs £2 (la; John Hull v. James Smith, £27 9s, costs £5 3s; J. and I). Oxley v. W. B. Baker. £11 Ills Bd. costs £i 18s; I) A. Nairn v. .1. McKenzie, 7.19s Id, coslb £1 Ills; J. Pelford v. C. W. Purdio, £11 12s 3d, costs £2 lis; W, Munro v, K. Starch, £2 18s lOd, oostf; £1 tit lid. JUIXIMENT SUMMONS CASF.3. •loliri Look v. C. W. S. Purdio, claim £816s lid. Ordered to pay half tho amount, in one month and the balance by 10s por month, or in default, 10 flays. John King v. J. K. Ilawlcy, £2S fid Od. Order, to pay by Instalments of £3 ilcr month, or in dofault, ono month. Noil McCulsky v. Donald McGinnea, £7 13s <M. Order, to pay 10a per week, or in default, eeven days. L. Moses v. A. Rolton, £7 lis. Order, 10s per week, or in dofault, seven days. L. Moses v. P. 11. Jenkins, el 18s. Order, 20s per week, or in dofault. ono month. ADJOURNED CASKB. A number of cases wero adjournod and struck out. DEFENDED CASE. Skerry v. White—Claim, £30 2s fid. —Mr Greenway and Mr Cottor for plaintiff, Mr Cooper In defence.—The plaintiff, Michael Skerry, claimed for balance on a contract for making steps to Mr John White's liouso in Grafton ltoad; tho job. however, Was not complotcd to defendants satisfaction, plaintiff alleging that defendant would dot permit him t_ complete the work. Elirht or nine witnesses were oxainined, and finally plaii.tif. was nonsuited with costs, £1 Is. This was completed business.