RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

Auckland Star, Volume XXI, Issue 4146, 12 October 1883, Page 4

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

[Before H. G. Seth Smttli

;sq..R.M.|

UNDEFENDED C.

Ik the following cases jucient went by default for the plaintiffs ?. J. Somerfield v. S. Green, £2 10s 3d uyFrenchard, v. John Eussell, £13; N.JJrain Agency Co. v. Geo. Harcourt, £4 10s 6d ; Benjamin Armitage v. Geo. ker, £{j. \y" L. Roth v. Jo3iah Malle £11 12s'(3d" Richard Forgie v. Edward ophy, £1 i 8 ' ADJOURXEI John King v. S. D. Egei £5 ; Sash and Door Co. v. John Renor£ls; Cousino and Atkin v. Albert Ellic£B 11 ; j 0 ™ Harris O'Brien v. Geo. ] Eaeton, £50 . Edward Cotter v. John ieraie, £] «» '. 6d ; Thomas Faulder t. Be :d McDonald £23 Os 2d ;B. H. Keesinj. Thos Gar lick, £12 6a; Close Br v. Clarence ' iv Young, £4 9s Id ; John erry v. J r> I MacCormiek, £7 4s 7d ; Sb v. Same,' £2 •' i 4s 9d ; B. H. Keesing vks, Buckland" £12 14s ; A. 11. Beale vos. Baker, £g JUDGMENT SUMMOJABEB. John- Hamilton* v. Ci Rose, claim £2 12s 7d. Payment ordekt the rate of 5s per week, in default W imprisonJohn Davis v. C. W. LAioNE. Claim £6 14s.—An order was njfor the payment of the claim on or beithe Ist pros: • in default, 10 days' imprisijnt. "' ■: DEFENDED CAI Thomas Con-stable v. sixH. Webb —Claim, £12, repairs to a ling-house jii Wellesley-street West.—Tltee was heard last Court day, and His Wlip now gave % judgment for the full amouLumed with £3 5s costs. I ' " Geo. Dcnnett v. Erneslll.— Claim £50, on a promissory notir £30, due March, 1878, with intereslereon! Mr Campbell appeared for pllff, an d r Tyler for defendant.—The <*cc wastbat the plaintiff had filed adeelionof insolvency subsequent to the dauths note. His Honor, in calcubtinJe interest §; found that the claim would^)d£so and therefore he held that the etas outejde his jurisdiction. Timothy Hayes v. W()oifc,_Qi a i ln 19s 6d; carriage of Circi£|<xls i _j|jf Theo. Cooper appeared for tßefeidaiit. —A man named King waapej w^q proved that Mr Woody ear hadd him for the services in respect of whiSJe ac ti on ". % had been brought.—Judgment accordingly given for the defendantwh costs Henby Jacobs v. GAEKETrBLdain^ £1 lls 3d, work and labou% e ;_^ : Cotter appeared for the plain Wd Mr * Campbell for the defendants. %laina£f ■ had oeen employed by the defan^ ' make up imitation wool-work sliVs, they supplying all the material excekj toon -' for stiffening the backs, and the\n nelu , tion agreed upon being Is 4d Kj f or '■'. - ! women a slippers, and Is 6d S^ f or .. a man's slippers. The plaintifftjmed that he had dorja work to tlvalae - ' of £9 6s 6d, and that he had onlyWy^j . * £7 15s 3d, leaving a baknee of £1 bj,^: .. . The defendants, on the other hjfqjp. tended that they had discharged alWnj against them. I y,