Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R. M. COURT.-Yesterday Concluded.

Mills v. Wright, claim «s, dimai, V : Cotter appeared for plaintiff' Mriffi! BrrH»"'. defendant, Baid the bill of parSS?"™' ]« .nfflolen*. Soeclflo datea Bh^SS h.^ u> dlven. Mr Cotter repUed. ana H J S n «« ruled, that in tola instance the «.-«T3"' ralaht ba enlflolent. Mr Coff K^'V oa«o; the parties oooaplea adjouUnu aS*!.* 8 in Morton and Cook-gueets. and «„» ■eals Mula. made a. dran thronah w a"; mtaea. but the work waii h»»i? i p * '; and plaintiff bad jU'^Mi venlanoe thereby.-Jane Mi^wMa^ttel--deposed th«! ihe pipea uiacea % %ffi WtUiiA tttrongh her pramlges wi»^2*^ that ihora ws a freqaent orerflw of Z* upon her Kronnd,and her oropa"Slfiffi? Her oats ai lpotetoea weresXPSßSthe ioaa at £4 per year (four years)? gffil"3, put to ths expense of carbolio pojrtsr X away fevar.-CrM9 exsminod br Sr S^'■ and Kllen Wr ghl R ay« evldaro^-cSX " e»oh Bide havin« Bpoken. Hla WirAloSi .naMMtion bo.hot Mr Thowe MdlSSito Son!° aa9 aLotmßnt beforoll^ . Elliott'v. Burke; claim. £3,105a.~MrCottaf' appeared for plaintiff; Mr Tyler dXba ( = Thta was a clalmraado by Capt.tt;EuSftSft, defendant a carman, tor lossßUßtaineaSiS defendant error in leaving a tnrbln&DirSr attheßailwayWharfinlieuofaenSSS;- : posed that he Raye low d. fendaaV4 WMmto ' atooß Bros; aefeo^ant was in Cantaia bK employ.-Captiln Elliott gave Blmilsrertdm™! on the 15th D«oamb,r lafct, ha^Swi » turbine and iron pipe M ?E. one or two hours after," defcniui came back and said the sohoooer woildaot taia them. He told Burke to get them baekandaiatthem to Stone Brothers. Burko retaraK' said the schooner had taken hlm.".KiiOirtM::: the goods were for the Thames, ha thoorfit thl; firm had sent them by one of their own vaaek ■ Stone Brothers held him responsible. Ec now claimed the amount o£ expenses in the s™ mona.-Edward George Smith also gave crt dence.—Defendant said he was ordered to tabi the things to Stone Bros.' yard at theEsflwny Wharf.—His Worship considered that defendant had been guilty oj negligence, and give"'" judgment for plaintiff, with costs. • :!..',.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18830406.2.25

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XIX, Issue 3955, 6 April 1883, Page 4

Word Count
322

R. M. COURT.-Yesterday Concluded. Auckland Star, Volume XIX, Issue 3955, 6 April 1883, Page 4

R. M. COURT.-Yesterday Concluded. Auckland Star, Volume XIX, Issue 3955, 6 April 1883, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert