Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAST NIGHT.

(Per Press Telegram Agency.)

Last evening's sitting of the House was confined mainly to. business of a private or stmi-private nature.

Bills Passed.

The following Bills passed : —Eailway Bill, Begistration of Birth and Death Bill, Marriage Act Amendment Bill. Anatomy Bill and Criminal Children's Act Amendment Bill ■were read a second time. Protection of Friendly Societies. In moving the second reading of tbe Friendly Societies' Act Amendment Bill, Mr Bouen said that sometime ago, in the South, the tie_surer of one of these Friendly Societies could not be convicted of embezzling ihe funds of the society, because, according to law, he was not a servant of the society in such sense as to make him liable to punishment ' falling upon a servant of any other society. If convicted of embezzlement or laiceny, this bill simply provided that tbe treasurer of a Friendly Society should be deemed to be a servant of the trustees within the meaning of the Larceny Act, 1867. The second reading of the bill agreed to. Admission of Evidence. Mr Bo wen moved the second reading of the Evidence Act Amendment Bill. He said it was clear that by restrictions now imposed by the law of evidence, much useful evidence was shut out of Courts of Law. The law of evidence in England had lately been amended so as to greatly reduce these restrictions. This bill was intended to bring the amendments of the English law into force in the colorry. Parties io actions for breath of promiselof marriage were to be competent to give evidence, and parties, and their husbands, and wives were to be competent to give evidence in suits for adultery. It was also. desirable to prevent that iiidecent hasie which was frequently noticed in lushiDg off to . Court to gain an advantage by getting out first snmmcnses. In these criminal summary proceedings, where the offender was punishable by fine or imprisonment, the persons charged and their husbands or wives should be competent to give evidence, but not compellable unless the person charged has voluntarily been examined or submitted to examination. It was proposed to get rid of the difficulty constantly occuring in the Courts owing to tbe religious scruples of per-sons^-quired as witnesses, by allowing those objecting to take oath to make a declaration and be triable for perjury in case of making a false declaration.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18750925.2.18.2

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1752, 25 September 1875, Page 3

Word Count
395

LAST NIGHT. Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1752, 25 September 1875, Page 3

LAST NIGHT. Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1752, 25 September 1875, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert