Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

i ■ THIS DAY. (Before Thorn as Becklam, Ssq. | R. Ml" ' The folio-wing cases cams on for hearing*"' morning, and were dispcsed of us under-"' \VM. BACON V. ('.JORGE TEBUTT. Claim, £4 7s Bd. • - This was a claim fc use and occupy ' in which plaintiff agree[ to take 2s a 'Hie .Court considerd this a veryF* * offer on the'part of plsntiff, as the pap™ in such small instalments would takefl^ y twelve months. ,„ > Mr Bacon, howeve* was willing tn" lenient as possible rifch defendant. , would accept the stub. Arranged a* 0™" ingly. Judgments fr Plaintiffs, Judgment for plaitiffs were g'T,^! i Henry Neale v. James Johnson, claim" ' I Roval Standard Golc Mining Cor#»y J. H. M. Shepherd, calj£l 15s;ditto t ; JJ ames Watters, calls £10 ; iitto v. James J»d-°n £4 7s fid ; ditto v. Thomas I *con> £1 5s • Neptune Gffl. Mining Con^Y v. (1. S. O'Halloran, alls £2 7s ; di* vLesthmge', £2,158 ■'•ffcto; v. Herir«!Sepker, £4 ; ditto v. Charle Snowden, £3 I&! John I Carey v. James loss, claim, boa" and lodging, £4 ; Joh:F. SaundersT. Walter M. Taylor, claim, oats, Vests, and lasers, £.10 • E. and H. Lacs v. W L. BA <J«in promissory note, £5 6d.; Evening^ Gold Minins? Company t Kennedy and-T^,- calls £4-ditto v. Mau.ce Power, £3; jitto v. Peter Norbury, A ; William Uder v. Patrick O'Neill, cairn £10. Will* Moyle v John i Griffiths, daim, board' and lodging, £1 10s: WilliairHudgson v. W. Donovan, claim, firewood, fte. fid. George May v. John Mull.illy, <aim for work, £U^-, and Faftny Gold Miing. Company f- »• J- | Fernandez, claim£l3 Gs Bd. Adjuened Cases. i Roya] Standai Gold Mining ftnpany v. James Macfarlan; claim, £815a/fcedenckLbverock v. F. I Fenton ; claimfoods, ±4 7s 6d. Patrick .rcher v. Patrid Heath ; claim, money lat, £5. , Charlei Burke v. Thomas Crispe ; wages, £1(5. G.f>- Chapman v. Lewis Gmett ; claim, doiges, £18. And; William Lers v. John Unci ; claim, commission, £8 s.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18730418.2.16

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume IV, Issue 1013, 18 April 1873, Page 3

Word Count
320

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Auckland Star, Volume IV, Issue 1013, 18 April 1873, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Auckland Star, Volume IV, Issue 1013, 18 April 1873, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert