Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Retailers' Rights

Occasionally consumers become irate because a retailer refuses to sell them something iri his shop. Consumers frequently write: to the Economic Information Service asking what they can do on such occasions, but the legal position is that in general they cannot compel the retailer to sell a particular item from his stocks. A retailer may have articles in his window for display purposes only, and, although he invites customers in, his shop is not a place of compulsory sale from the point of view of the law. Subject to the conditions imposed by emergency wartime regulations, the retailer is allowed to choose his customers as he pleases; otherwise he might have tc sell to his worst enemy, his trade rival, or to an irrational drunk person who tried to make rash purchases. Retailers' rights in this matter are limited by their obligations under, the Price Stabilisation Emergency' Regulations. Hoarding is prohibited and a retailer cannot refuse to sell goods at the price fixed in official price orders or price authorisations The hoarding clause in the Regulations might be held to operate where a shopkeeper persistently refused to sell to a number of persons, but it'does not prevent the retailer selecting the customers to whom he disposes of his stocks. Our rationing regulations also affect the position, because, even* where the cnustomer offers the correct price, the shopkeeper cannot sell rationed goods without receiving coupons. Besides this, there are many things such as tinned fruit, bacon and tobacco, which are officially rationed to the retailer but not couponed. The business ethics of our community generally favuor the regular customer and there is no law compelling the retailer to sell any of his meagre supply to a stranger The fairness of this method is apparent when we think of what might happen if the law compelled the retailer to sell his stocks out to the first customers who arrived A few people could buy more than their share.of the scarce commodities and none would be left for thr mass of consumers.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AHCOG19470219.2.32

Bibliographic details

Alexandra Herald and Central Otago Gazette, 19 February 1947, Page 8

Word Count
341

Retailers' Rights Alexandra Herald and Central Otago Gazette, 19 February 1947, Page 8

Retailers' Rights Alexandra Herald and Central Otago Gazette, 19 February 1947, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert