Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Precedence Question.

We do not suppose many of our readers care whether, in his individual capacity, Sir Robert Stout walks be-

hind Mr Seddon or Mr Seddon walks behind Sir Robert Stout. In this democratic country we prefer to discard as much as possible forms that have become empty anu meaningless. Still it there must be an authoritative order of precedence there can be little doubt that the chief officers of the law should rank before men who hold mini-terial office. Ministers are often creatures of a day and merely represent the strongest of two or more conflicting parties. But the Chief Justice is the principal representative of the democratic standard of right, and is entitled, in his official capacity, to the highest honour that can be paid. For some mysterious reason the Premier has endeavoured to bring about a change in the table of precedence that places the Chief Justice in an inferior position. This is unseemly and we trust that Parliament will educate Mr Seddon on the matter.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/WHIRIB19030701.2.19

Bibliographic details

White Ribbon, Volume 9, Issue 98, 1 July 1903, Page 7

Word Count
171

The Precedence Question. White Ribbon, Volume 9, Issue 98, 1 July 1903, Page 7

The Precedence Question. White Ribbon, Volume 9, Issue 98, 1 July 1903, Page 7

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert