Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Lubrication

I wonder how many, or rather how few, cars are run on oil of a properly high viscosity, and here I use the word "viscosity" as indicative of a good "body" at all usual engine temperatures. Statistics would be difficult to obtain, since most motorists would return an answer to the effect that they are using the class of oil recommended by the manufacturers of their cars. And that is just where the trouble lies. When a car is new, when it is just as received from the makers, the mechanical conditions of the motor are such that the clearance between parts is of the minimum order. Then, certainly, a fairly thin oil gives quite good results, and, as thin oil feed is the easiest to regulate, lubricant of this

character is what the manufacturers usually recommend. Another reason is that thick oil tends to gum up the piston, and this makes for difficulty in cranking. But after the parts of the engine have worn a little (and bedded in), largely because of the insufficient gravity of the lubricant, what happens is this : The thin oil freely works past the pistons, particularly after the throttle has been closed, and instead of adhering to the cylinder walls, enters the combustion chamber, where it carbonises, thus inaugerating a condition which leads to pre-ignition and other hateful ailments.

Again, when the pistons and cylinders have become worn, the compression does not hold up, and this means that petrol vapour works down past the pistons, thus entering the crank chamber and further reducing the viscosity of the oil. For example : A motorist told me last week that he used about a gallon of lubricating oil every couple of hundred miles. He had tried to reduce the feed, with a seized bearing as the result. On examination we found his

motor was badly worn internally, and, moreover, as I suspected, he was using a fairly thin oil. We drained his crankcase, and the content was a light fluid which possessed little lubricating value. It was far thinner than the oil in the tank, and this connoted that the processes above detailed had been in operation. Oil, modern high-grade oil, does not decompose in the crank chamber, and in the instance under mention the fault lay with my friend in sticking to the same sort of oil ever since he had bought the car.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/P19141001.2.24.1

Bibliographic details

Progress, Volume X, Issue 2, 1 October 1914, Page 63

Word Count
399

Lubrication Progress, Volume X, Issue 2, 1 October 1914, Page 63

Lubrication Progress, Volume X, Issue 2, 1 October 1914, Page 63

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert