Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Lights and the Law.

A recent judgment has laid down the relation thus: — (1) A man cannot by reducing his ancient light throw a new burden, or increase an existing burden, upon his neighbour; (2) a man by reducing his ancient light does not (unless it becomes a case of de minimis) lose his right to object to a building on his neighbour's land, which he might have objected to before such reduction, unless the building does not seriously affect the reduced window; (3) the mere closing up of part of an ancient window does not confer upon the owner of the servient tenement any right to erect before such reduction, unless he can show that the reduced window will not be affected by such building.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/P19081001.2.16.2

Bibliographic details

Progress, 1 October 1908, Page 420

Word Count
126

Lights and the Law. Progress, 1 October 1908, Page 420

Lights and the Law. Progress, 1 October 1908, Page 420

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert