HOME RULE.

New Zealand Tablet, Volume XVI, Issue 15, 3 August 1888, Page 19

HOME RULE.

that .he demand for Home Rule aa rlnV Pa I J i? On Sr the leß9 trae woa]d still be a lawful hnd rig ht p ou deS / Mr " Glad "^e, aaonly shghtiy-delayed triump T Mr SS Vn"^ deß ' ined to Home Rul at Mr. Parnell's rearLt Z \ £ » ne dld not *»ke up took it up, firstly, because at X fi « < Mr - Parn eH' 8 threat. He franchiee^ihe vaU majority o f the Iri^' 100 - UQder tbe exteQd «d favour of the demand LZ^%£l^J^^ Stlt T uAe » dedared * he himself had become couJinSd ? y ,, ; a ? d Becond^, because justice of that tomtriL?}™^*™* o*^0 *^ h^ clearly, of the Mr. Parnell's guilt. Were tbe Irish f° ™ ea . ns '"compatible witn majority of kw-.bid.ng irL elej orß ZtZ * ft dißcredi^d, the credit nor change their views £ ™ Id neither Bhare bis disthe people, android sS be a frTpec^e ?" "? the C^ "f" f is necessarily hampered, but not Trended ,? T J Tt 7 ' A jaat cau »c ness of its advocates. We areliS ]U8t ' by the u«worthiirust, impossible-hypothee^s T- but if I?™ &f& f im P roba ble-and, we as a general fact th, 8 independe^ M -V !■ tbe "^ Chance - ™* worth remembering Que P en aen.e of a policy and its ageata i*