Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FIG. 10. NEW ZEALAND AND IMPORTED LINES COMPARED : RECOVERY IN FOREGROUND AFTER HAY. True perennial (Hawke’s Bay Type 1) on left; false perennial (imported Types 4 and 5) on right. Cattle series behind labels.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZJAG19300620.2.2.10

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume XL, Issue 6, 20 June 1930, Page 381

Word Count
34

FIG. 10. NEW ZEALAND AND IMPORTED LINES COMPARED : RECOVERY IN FOREGROUND AFTER HAY. True perennial (Hawke’s Bay Type 1) on left; false perennial (imported Types 4 and 5) on right. Cattle series behind labels. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume XL, Issue 6, 20 June 1930, Page 381

FIG. 10. NEW ZEALAND AND IMPORTED LINES COMPARED : RECOVERY IN FOREGROUND AFTER HAY. True perennial (Hawke’s Bay Type 1) on left; false perennial (imported Types 4 and 5) on right. Cattle series behind labels. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume XL, Issue 6, 20 June 1930, Page 381

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert