Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FIG. 6. SAME LINE AS IN FIGS. 4 AND 5, SHOWING WEIGHINGS. The weight of the sixteen largest is 4¾lb., and that of the sixteen smallest 1 ¾ lb. The grading is therefore “ 4 ¾ /1 ¾ .” There being more than 2½ lb. between the two weights, the line would be rejected for inefficient grading.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZJAG19300422.2.9.6

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume XL, Issue 4, 22 April 1930, Page 268

Word Count
52

FIG. 6. SAME LINE AS IN FIGS. 4 AND 5, SHOWING WEIGHINGS. The weight of the sixteen largest is 4¾lb., and that of the sixteen smallest 1¾lb. The grading is therefore “4¾/1¾.” There being more than 2½ lb. between the two weights, the line would be rejected for inefficient grading. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume XL, Issue 4, 22 April 1930, Page 268

FIG. 6. SAME LINE AS IN FIGS. 4 AND 5, SHOWING WEIGHINGS. The weight of the sixteen largest is 4¾lb., and that of the sixteen smallest 1¾lb. The grading is therefore “4¾/1¾.” There being more than 2½ lb. between the two weights, the line would be rejected for inefficient grading. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume XL, Issue 4, 22 April 1930, Page 268

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert