Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Topics of the Day.

By Our London Comapondent.

TRAGIC SIDE OF MARRIAGE. LONDON, June 10. Tn XTTF EDDINGS be funerals, a /7 I b’lieve, nowadays,’’ says a I 1 1, robust old housewife in one of Thomas Hardy’s novels, who marvelled at the marriage tragedies happening around her. One recalls old Mrs. Edlin’s words in perusing the evidence being given before the Royal Commission on divorce. Cruelty, unfaithfulness, desertion, habitual drunkenness, lunacy—these are the sad fruits of the marriages with which the Royal Commission is concerned. If a stranger to the modern world were to come across reports of the Divorce Commission, he might well be excused for thinking that of all states of Luman misery modern marriage is about the worst!

The real problem before the Commission is to decide what is moral and what is immoral. Commissioners, witnesses, and public a_re all agreed that the object to be aimed at is maintenance of a high standard of social morality, but when it comes to an interpretation of that very abstract phrase in terms of human relationships, great are the differences of opinion revealed. Some there are among the witnesses who still oppose divorce on the ground that marriage is a holy sacrament which man-made laws can never annul. Such people regard as immoral the marriage of divorced persons, holding that the original marriage remains a sacred bond in spite of the Divorce Court. Other witnesses —representing no doubt a considerable body of educated opinion—assume that when love is dead husband and wife are better parted, on moral as well as social grounds. Can a loveless union be a moral one, even though it has the sanction of the church? And ought anyone to be immoral for moral reasons? Such are the questions which their evidence seems to answer in the negative. Such views as these, it may be noted, are declared to be very rare among the very class for whom greater facilities for divorce are now being sought. The wife of an East End vicar, who has worked among the poor for eighteen years, told the Commission that she had never heard of one case where a man or woman among them had desired divorce, however unhappy their marriages had proved. They accepted as binding upon them the words of the sacrament. “For better for worse.” Rough, even brutal, men and women, said the vicar's wife, held by the firm conviction that husband and wife were one till death. Against this, however, must be placed the testimony of magistrates and others brought into close touch with the poor, to the effect that many couples who have Separated without being divorced, form lawless unions almost as a matter of course.

FORTUNE FROM A PHRASE. Sir George Newnes, whose death occurred this week, owed his fortune to a happy thought—a sudden idea, which, awakened by a casual phrase, altered the whole course of his life, and started him on the high road to financial success. ■ ■ The story goes that one evening, when he was sitting at home reading, Mr. ■lNewnea, as he then was, suddenly looked up from the paper before him, and remarked to his wife concerning a certain paragraph which he had just read: “That’s what I call a real tit bit.” In that remark lay the germ of one of the most remarkable newspaper successes of modern times. For Mr. Newnes was quick to conceive the idea that in a paper consisting entirely of such “titbibs” there might be a fortune, and in due course the truth of this was abundantly proved.

For a. time other business connected .with Mr. Newnes’ post in the city presented the project from being proceeded with, but in a year Mr. Newnes had completed his plan, and in the October of 1881, when he himself was just thirty ■years of ago, the first number of “Titißits” was published in Manchester, and llhe paper leaped at a bound into immediate success. In Manchester alone 6,000 copies were sold in two hours, and Mr. Newnes soon found that he must give all his attention to his new venture.

How lavishly and in .vhit ingenious ways “Tit Bits” was advertised is well remembered. Its proprietor started the now widely-adopted system of newspaper insurance coupons, and it was with “Tit Bits” that some of the most remarkable competitions ever known were associated. One of the prizes offered was a ten-roomed house, another was .£2 a week for life, another a berth on the staff of the paper—which latter, by the way, led to the post being secured by Mr. C. Arthur Pearson, who afterwards

founded the “Daily Express,” and acquired the “Standard” and many other papers. •Sir George Newnes once started in the newspaper business, never looked tack. He founded the “Strand Magazine,” the “Review of Reviews,’ tiie “Westminster Gazette,” and other magazines and journals, and built up a great publishing business.

SINGER AT 107. Still sprightly and in perfect health, King George’s oldest subject in the British Isles, Mns. Rebecca t'laike, entered this week upon her 107th year. She celebrated her birthday al th-' house of her -son, at Wood Green, London N. Mrs. Clarke, a well-preserved dame, who looks no more than eighty, still takes a keen enjoyment in life. Every Friday, if the weather is line, she walks up a stiff hill to. the loeal post office, ■some 500 yards from her home, to draw her pension, and declares Fiat the journey is not a bit too much for her. Her eyesight is still so good that she has not yet taken to glasses. She threads her own needle when she wishes to do a little sewing. ’ “You sec," I do not feel old," smilingly explained this wonderful old lady. “I get up about ten o’clock, anil this time of the year I go to bed soon after eight, o’clock. Do 1 have a nap during the day?

No, of course not! Why, 1 should feel ashamed of myself if I did sueh a thing. “My appetite is capital, and 1 enjoy my food as much as ever. Today, for dinner, I had a mutton chop, potatoes, bread and some suet pudding. But I can eat anything, and I like a hard crust. I have been a teetotaller for the last forty years, and I do not feel the need of any stimulant, but 1 find i nice cup of tea very refreshing in the afternoon. I am quite looking forward to ■my birthday to-morrow, and I do hope the sun will shine.

“I can still sing a song—one of the old ones—to my great-grandchildren when they come to see me, and I can go through the steps of the old dances which were popular when I was a girl. I have no ache or pain, but I am not quite so firm on my feet as I used to be.”

Nicholas: “You must die; but I will do it gently. It is my nature to be gentle!” (The civic and political rights which Finland had won for her people were recently swept away with one stroke of the pen by. the Czar of Russia. Thus once more does the most cruel and greedy autocracy of the age strangle one of the most democratic and enlightened States in Europe.)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZGRAP19100727.2.81

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Graphic, Volume XLV, Issue 4, 27 July 1910, Page 47

Word Count
1,218

Topics of the Day. New Zealand Graphic, Volume XLV, Issue 4, 27 July 1910, Page 47

Topics of the Day. New Zealand Graphic, Volume XLV, Issue 4, 27 July 1910, Page 47

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert