CONTROL OF RESERVES AND SANCTUARIES
URGENT REFORMS NEEDED.
New Zealand has the weirdest possible way of dealing' with its scenic reserves and sanctuaries for native fauna and flora (says a writer in “Truth”). Some of the scenic reserves are under the Commissioners for Crown Lands. (Policy No. 1.) One of the greatest, the Tongariro National Park, is under a board consisting of a large number of officials, Government nominees, and ex-officio persons (like the Mayors for the time being of Auckland and Wellington, who may be persons utterly out of touch with scenic, indigenous, and playground values). (This is policy No. 2.) Another great national park (Mt. Egmont) is also under a board, but there the resemblance to Tongariro ceases, because the Mt. Egmont Park Board is for the most part elected, and elected locally.. (Policy No. 3.) Kapiti Island sanctuary gets away from an empowered board. ; It is run by the Lands . Department, with the aid of a merely Advisory Board. (Policy. No. 4.) Here is a medley of methods to begin with. .
Again,; there are ever so many Government Departments with some sort of a finger in the management of reserves and sanctuaries, game, etc. The Lands Department controls a number of reserves and forests. ... ...... The .Forest Service controls a number. The Tourist Department gets its oar in somewhere. The Department of Internal Affairs interferes in a number of matters concerning game, etc. And this seems to. be the Department that bosses collectors’ permits, a factor of great danger. Fish seems to be partly under the last two Departments, and also under the Marine Department. And the Marine Department’s lighthouse-keepers, in some cases, are in a position to help (or not to help) the native fauna. . To complete the Babel, the acclimatisation societies fall in at the tail of the departmental procession. - And the police are occasionally pressed into the service, where poaching is con l cerned. Anything more weirdly ineffective than this network of authorities, mostly incompetent or inactive, it would be hard to imagine.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/FORBI19250301.2.15
Bibliographic details
Forest and Bird, Issue 8, 1 March 1925, Page 12
Word Count
338CONTROL OF RESERVES AND SANCTUARIES Forest and Bird, Issue 8, 1 March 1925, Page 12
Using This Item
For material that is still in copyright, Forest & Bird have made it available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This periodical is not available for commercial use without the consent of Forest & Bird. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this magazine please refer to our copyright guide.
Forest & Bird has made best efforts to contact all third-party copyright holders. If you are the rights holder of any material published in Forest & Bird's magazine and would like to discuss this, please contact Forest & Bird at editor@forestandbird.org.nz