Page image

took steps to secure the skin for stuffing, and, in the course of removing the skin, the men who did the work cut the greater part of the body to pieces, and they brought me some very curious teeth which they obtained a considerable distance down the throat, and, as far as I can learn, immediately between the branchial openings. The teeth were about one inch in length, the upper portion slightly curved, longitudinally striated, and gradually diminishing in diameter from the base to a sharp point. There were three rows of these teeth on each side of the pharynx, and the numbers may be expressed thus: 7, 9, 6, and 8, 9, 6. Three of these teeth are clearly accidental, one on the first row of the one side, and two on the first row of the other side, thus leaving the formula 6, 9, 6 and 6, 9, 6. The teeth are immovably fixed in solid cartilage, and when fresh there was between each row a thick fleshy gum or pad, which nearly covered the teeth. Pharyngeal teeth are not uncommon in fishes, but I have not been able to find any mention of them in the Sun-Fish or other Gymnodonts. Another observation may, perhaps, be interesting. When I examined this fish on the beach, the surface of both jaws was covered with a kind of enamel, and felt perfectly smooth to the touch. When I received the skin, and had leisure to examine it closely, I found that rough handling, owing to the huge size and weight, had caused the enamel to scale off, and had left the jaws, which were now rough, presenting a surface resembling the shagreen of the dermal papillæ; but at the back edge of both upper and lower jaws were the original teeth of the fish, in size and shape much resembling grains of rice. These, I find from books, are serviceable in the earlier life of the fish, but when it attains a large size, these are absorbed (or are said to be). They seem, however, to be simply left behind by the growth of a broad horizontal layer of calcified tissue, which is covered on the top with a thin coat of enamel. The great size of this specimen, 8 feet 1 ½ inches in length, and 5 feet 6 inches in depth, not including the dorsal and anal fins, would probably indicate an advanced age. The bony osselets, which are said to carry a spine in young specimens, were present, but their presence could not be detected in the living state. They were about the size of a duck egg. Postscript.—A specimen of the Spinous Shark (Echinorhinus spinosus) has been captured in Hawke's Bay this month (September. 1885); it has been previously recorded in New Zealand waters by Prof. Parker, “Trans. N. Z. Inst.,” vol. xvi., p. 280.

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert