Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image

C—l 3

Session 11. 1912. NKW ZEALAND

CASE OF MR. JOHN MAHER: REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CROWN LANDS, NEW PLYMOUTH, UPON SECTION 3, BLOCK XV, OHURA.

Laid on the Table ol the House of Representatives by Leave.

REPORT FROM COMMISSIONER OF CROWN LANDS, NEW PLYMOUTH

26th July, 1912. Section 3, Block XV, Ohnra. As instructed by your telegram of to-day, I beg to report as follows on the dealings with Section 3, Block XV, Ohura, as disclosed by the papers on our file 5155. This section was originally taken up by Mr. John Penny, who was successful at a ballot held on the 17th May, 1906. There were eighty-six eligible applicants in the ballot. Residence was not required for four years from the 26th June, 1906. under the Bush and Swamp Crown Lands Settlement Act. An advance of £200 was made by the Government Advances Office on the 6th January, 1909. On the 23rd March, 1909, Penny applied to transfer to John and Robert Morris, and also to have transferred to him from Mr. A. H. Lee, Section 14, Block XIV, Ohura, on the ground of getting near a school for the benefit of his children. The memorandum of dealing recommending the transfer was signed by the late Mr. Simpson on the 21st April, 1909. The improvements done were £139 10s., the Government value of the land £447 10s., and the consideration paid £700. On the Bth August, 1910, Crown Lands Ranger Tolme reported that the improvements were well ahead of present requirements, but that the selectors were not residing just then, and that no stock was on the section, and stated that it was reported that John Morris had absconded with all the money he could raise on the section and stork, and that the other brother was too ill to do any work. On the 7th September, 1910, Messrs. Spence and Stanford, solicitors, wrote to the Commissioner of Crown Lands, New Plymouth, that acting for the second mortgagee, they intended to sell, and asked for delay in any forfeiture proceedings till they could sell to a suitable man ; and on the 20th September, 1910, the Land Board resolved to defei consideration for the present. The sale was held at Stratford on Saturday. 1 he I 7th December, 1910, and the section was purchased by Joshua Harris, of Taumarunui. and the Board and Minister in due course passed the transfei. Mr. Joshua Harris, on the 27th April, 1911, was informed that residence was required till October, 1912, which would take about eighteen months only of residence requited. On the sth May, 1911, Messrs. Marshall and Hutton, solicitors. Wanganui, wrote asking that Mr. Harris, on account of its being inconvenient foi him to take up his residence, be permitted to transfer to Mr. J. E. Deadman for £1,000. The price Mr. Harris paid at auction was £570. and to this must be added the £200 Government mortgage, for which he was financed by Mr. Hatrick. Nothing had been done to the section by Harris in' the meantime, as far as I can trace. Mr. Armstrong, in reply, referred them to section 84 of the Land Act. However, Mr. Harris went on with his application, which was refused later on. On the 29th May Ranger Tolme reported, in answer to a requisition requiring him to ascertain if Harris were residing, that Mr. Deadman having, as he thought, purchased it, was in possession. Mr. Deadman stated that he had been assured by Mr. Hatrick that there was nothing to prevent his taking possession. Mr. Tolme stated that in his opinion it was a case for inquiry ; and stated that it was common talk that Harris was only acting as a dummy for Hatrick, and apparently had had no intention of residing, as from the first he had been doing his best to sell. Mr. Harris was manager at Taumarunui for Mr. Hatrick.

2

a—l 3

On the 20th June 1911, the Board refused the application to transfer, and resolved to notify Mr. Harris that his interest was forfeited, and Mr. Deadman that he was illegally in possession. It did so on the 26th June, 1911. On the 29th June Messrs. Marshall and Hutton, of Wanganui, wrote, stating that what led up to the transaction was that Messrs. Morris Bros, were indebted to Hatrick and Co. for £120 for grass-seed and supplies, and that the only way they had of securing their money was by undertaking to finance Harris on his giving a mortgage over the section. They stated that Mr. Harris found the business too much for him. and then sought to transfer to Deadman. Mr. Hatrick also wrote on the 29th June, and I attach a copy of his letter. Messrs. Marshall and Hutton were told that Mr. Harris could not appeal, as the refusal to the transfer was an administrative act. Mr. James T. Hogan, then a member of the House, also wrote to the Commissioner asking him to reconsider the matter, and Mr. Armstrong wrote to the Under-Secretary for Lands that the forfeiture would be reconsidered on the 15th July, 1911, but the question was deferred till the 15th August. The question was gone into in the presence of all parties, and the Head Office was notified by memo. 5155/63 of the 15th August, and Mr. Harris was also notified, that the forfeiture had been confirmed. Some trouble had arisen between Hatrick and Deadman over the matter, and Deadman had refused to attend a Board meeting unless Hatrick reduced the price by £100. Mr. Hatrick on the sth September wrote, asking the Board to place a valuation on the section sufficient to cover, in addition to the Advances to Settlers mortgage, the amount spent by Deadman on the section. On the 19th September, 1911, the Land Board resolved to offer the section at public auction for cash at a total upset of £1,408 10s., made up of £320 lis. 6d. for improvements, and the rest capital value, out of which mortgagees were to be paid off. On the 21st December Mr. Armstrong notified the Head Office that there was no bid for the section. On the 23rd|December Mr. Hatrick guaranteed to find a bona fide settler in the person of a nephew of his, but the Land Board decided it had no power to dispose of land privately, but resolved to recommend offering it for sale at a capital value of £500 weighted with first and second mortgages and £42 10s. improvements to be paid in cash. On the Bth January, 1912, Mr. Kensington asked that the matter be brought before the Board for consideration at an early date. As a result, on the Bth January the Commissioner, Mr. Armstrong, sent down a schedule to Wellington to offer the land under optional conditions at £500 capital value, weighted in addition with £692 10s. to be paid in cash, for two mortgages and improvements. These latter were described — 55 acres felled only, £68 15s. ; 105 acres felled and grassed, £52 10s. ; 5 chains wire-netting fence, 12s. 6d. ; 101 chains fencing, £84 7s. ; 58 chains fencing-wire on posts. £4 7s. : four-roomed house, £90 ; whare, £15 : pataka, £5 : total, £320 lis. 6d. On the 26th February, shortly after my own arrival in New Plymouth, I wrote to Wellington asking that the offering for sale be delayed pending ;i rehearing, but on being informed that the sale had been advertised, advised letting it go on. On the 15th April the section was selected by Mr. Maher on the cash system. On the 23rd April Mr. Maher wrote that the value of the section had been misrepresented. I may state here that there was a clerical error in the description, but that it was an error of description only, and did not affect the value of the improvements. A correct description of these should have been as follows : 105 acres in grass, £121 ss. (of this 55 acres in bush land felled and grassed) ; 5 chains wire netting, 12s. 6d. ; 101 chains fencing, £84 7s. ; 58 chains fencing-wire on posts, £84 7s. ; four-roomed house, £90 ; whare, £15 ; pataka, £5 : total. £320 lis. 6d. This mistake was in saying that there were 55 acres felled besides the 105 acres, but this was a mistake in favour of any applicant, as any one would have been better without the bush felled in a season like last. It will also be noticed that the Head Office advertised the section at a total of £1,408 10s., instead of £1,192 10s. as recommended by the Land Board. No exception was taken to this here, and it was thought that the Head Office had decided to keep to the values of the previous offering. Mr. Maiier, after some correspondence, paid all the money under our advice, pending inquiry Mr. Maher, in forwarding the balance of the purchase-money, stated he was paving £226 ss. under protest. I called your attention to this in my memo, to you (5515/157) on the Ist June last. On the sth June I received a letter from.Mr. Hatrick offering to take over the property. On the 25th June I received a telegram from you to expedite the issue of the lease, and a few days later r posted it to Mr. Maher. Mr. Deadman's money for his improvements has been posted. As an evidence of the value of the section, 1 would draw your attention to a letter from J. C. Morgan to Messrs. Hatrick and Co., and I may also state that 1 chanced to hear this morning that Mr. Maher is already trying to sell this section at an advance on what he paid. There is some possibility of Mr. Hatrick petitioning the House over this, and a good deal of the trouble arose over his attempting to put Harris into the section to secure his interest, a considerable amount of which was for grass-seed supplied to Morris Bros., but which was never grown on this section. G. H. Bullard, The Under-Secretary for Lands. \ Commissioner of Crown Lands. Approximate Oost of Paper.— Preparation, not given ; printing (1,400 copies), £1 7s. 6d,

Authority : John Mackay, Government Printer, Wellington.—l9l2

Price 3d.]

This report text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see report in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1912-II.2.2.2.22

Bibliographic details

CASE OF MR. JOHN MAHER: REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CROWN LANDS, NEW PLYMOUTH, UPON SECTION 3, BLOCK XV, OHURA., Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1912 Session II, C-13

Word Count
1,696

CASE OF MR. JOHN MAHER: REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CROWN LANDS, NEW PLYMOUTH, UPON SECTION 3, BLOCK XV, OHURA. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1912 Session II, C-13

CASE OF MR. JOHN MAHER: REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CROWN LANDS, NEW PLYMOUTH, UPON SECTION 3, BLOCK XV, OHURA. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1912 Session II, C-13