Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image

J.—l

1882. NEW ZEALAND.

PETITION OF DEFERRED-PAYMENT & AGRICULTURAL SETTLERS IN THE PROVINCIAL DISTRICT OF OTAGO.

Presented to the Souse of Representatives 9th June, and ordered, to he printed.

To the Honorable the Members of the House of Representatives of the General Assembly of New Zealand in Parliament assembled. The Petition" op tub ujstdeesigh'ed Depebeed-Payme:n"t Selectoes and AfIEictrLTUEAL Settlees IN THE PeOVINCTAL DISTEICT OP OIAGO. Humbly Showeth, — That many of your petitioners have taken up land on deferred payment under the provisions of the law in force for the time being in the colony. 2. That many of your petitioners have obtained their land after competition at auction, and that, owing to the length of time over which the payments were spread, over competition, at a time when a species of land fever had seized the entire community, and a too limited area of land being opened for settlement, they have given prices at auction far beyond the real value of the land. 3. That many of your petitioners now find it impossible to complete the payments which they had, under the pressure of the circumstances detailed, undertaken to make. 4. That, when selectors are in arrear of payment, the Land Act contains provisions of a highly unjust and oppressive character, amounting, if put in force, to a confiscation of their property and the forfeiture of large sums which they may have paid towards the purchase-money. 5. That, in consequence, many of your petitioners have been compelled to effect forced loans to escape such confiscation and forfeiture, and, in order to give security for such loans, have been driven to pay up in full the remaining unpaid instalments of purchase-money. 6. That although these instalments are, under the contract, payable to the Crown only over a series of years, yet the selectors have received no rebate of interest for their immediate payment in one sum, and your petitioners are therefore now practically paying two interests on the same sum of money—one to their mortgagees, and the other to the Crown, for which latter they have received no consideration. 7. That others of your petitioners have taken up areas varying from 50 to 200 acres on the deferred-payment system, and find themselves debarred by the terms of the Land Act from completing their selections up to 320 acres. 8. That others of your petitioners who have acquired the freehold of lands held under deferred payments, however small the area, are also debarred by the Land Act from any further selection. 9. That others of your petitioners have taken up land without opposition during the period within which " The Crown Lands Sales Act, 1877," was in operation. 10. That it was a matter so doubtful whether the said Act really raised the price of deferredpayment land from 30s. to 605., that the Waste Lands Board felt compelled to obtain the legal opinion of a Judge of the Supreme Court on the point, who advised that the terms of the said Act had that effect. 11. That some of your petitioners took the best legal advice, including that of Robert Stout, Esq., the framer of the said Act, and were advised to the direct contrary. 12. That your petitioners have been informed, and verily believe, that the said Act was not intended by the Legislature to raise the price of deferred-payment land. 13. That many of your petitioners selected land during the said period under the full impression and belief that an amending Act would be immediately passed, providing that the true intention of the Legislature should be legally carried out, and the price of land which had been selected without opposition be legally fixed at 30s. per acre. 14. That accordingly the said Act was repealed during the session of 1879, but the repeal was unfortunately not made retroactive. 15. That some of your petitioners have selected land which had remained open for a considerable time at 30s. per acre prior to the passing of the said Act, and for which no application had been received, and yet are liable to pay £3 per acre, although the price in these very blocks has again been lowered to 30s. per acre, and some of the land is still unapplied for even at the reduced price.

I—J. 1.

J.—l.

2

16. That your petitioners find that, owing to the uncertainties affecting agricultural pursuits, the occurrence of bad harvests, and occasionally exceptionally low prices of produce, the provisions of the present law, requiring fixed payments annually on pain of confiscation and forfeiture, work exceedingly to their disadvantage. 17. Your petitioners beg humbly to say that they are anxious and willing to pay for their land according to the true and fair price or value thereof, but, owing to the exceptional circumstances already referred to under which their licenses were acquired, they are at present bound to pay far beyond that value. 18. Tour petitioners humbly submit that a revaluation of their lands by competent and impartial persons, and such a rearrangement of the terms of payment as will enable them to pay off the principal price at such times as they may be able so to do, would be equitable in it&elf and for the best interests of the agricultural settlement of the colony. 19. That your petitioners beg humbly and respectfully to direct the attention of your honorable House to a Bill prepared by John Aitken Connell to amend the Land Act, a copy of which, they have been informed, has been sent to each member of your honorable House, which provides, in the opinion of your petitioners, a fair and practical remedy for the grievances under which your petitioners suffer, and which, if passed into law, would, in the opinion of your petitioners, prevent the recurrence of complications alike hurtful to the settlers in the community. 20. That your petitioners approve of all the provisions of the said Bill in so far as the same relate to deferred-payment land, excepting that the words " at auction " should be struck out of clause 34, and that personal residence on pastoral deferred-payment land should, in the opinion of your petitioners, be retained, and that the words " less the amount of the sum of the instalments already paid " should be added to clause 41. Tour petitioners therefore humbly pray that your honorable House will take their heavy grievances into its favourable consideration, and devise such measures for the relief and otherwise, either by passing the said Bill into law or otherwise, as to your honorable House may seem meet. And your petitioners will over pray. Thomas Daily Darton Philip Cahill Thomas Kelly John Sheehan John Hall William Draper John Mackenzie Francis Nicoll William Colquhoun James Harpstonge Michael Monaghan Allan Mitchell Philip Brook Thomas E. Williams John Duncan Daniel Donald William Holland Adam Scott William H. Bayly Hugh Eoss Thomas Cleary Patrick Fahey John Donaldson James Eoss William McAllan John Tucker S. Eowe John Eose Smith John Munro Eichard Webb John Cole Chappie Alexander Eobertson Wright Lowe Eobert Cunningham M. O'Gorman Adam Swan D. Hunter Mervyn W. A. Porteous James Hopkins James McMichael Thomas Brunton James Mclntosh Frederick Cogan Eobert Loudon Eichard Nichols William Bendle George Thomson John Nichols George Dawson John Tuckey ( Eobert Coffee David Gardiner William Folchcr James White Eobert Matheson G. F. C. Browne Patrick Duffy Eobert Simms A. Michael James Eobertson Thomas Darton Eobert Elliott John Smith Patrick Mclnernoy John W. Christie Michael Nash James B. Darton John Fitzgerald John Drew James Cahiil Maurice Spillaue Samuel Abrim David Mclntosh James Dawnes James O'Brien James Docherty George W. Dewes Timothy Driscoll Henry C. Clayton John Smith Thomas G. Bobertson James Chalmers John Bulfin Donald M. Alpine John Morrison John Hughes Alexander Campbell Finlay Munro W. G. Anderson Martin Joyce Philip Duff James Wilson John Joyce John Duffey Daniel Lawrence Patrick Cummings Watts Goodwin Thomas Hinde Timothy Crowly James Buchanan John Thompson Daniel Crowly J. Bennet William Blay Cornelius O'Gormon John Brown Eobert Cotton Thomas Fahey ' Martin Franklin John Long John Donohue Francis Eoss James Kcppel James Hayes Samuel Anderson Charles Mullin Dennis Eoughan Thomas Tyler John Turton Daniel O'Brien Isaiah Mee John Hogg Alexander Loudon Thomas Hoare F. S. Margetts Phillip Flynu John Casius M. Kelleher Timothy Kelleher Patrick Kean William Johnston Michael Hunt James Capstick Patrick A hern George Brook. James Treloar Eobert Eoss

By Authority: Q-eoegb Didsbuet, Government Printer, Wellington.—1882.

This report text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see report in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1882-I.2.2.6.1

Bibliographic details

PETITION OF DEFERRED-PAYMENT & AGRICULTURAL SETTLERS IN THE PROVINCIAL DISTRICT OF OTAGO., Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1882 Session I, J-01

Word Count
1,396

PETITION OF DEFERRED-PAYMENT & AGRICULTURAL SETTLERS IN THE PROVINCIAL DISTRICT OF OTAGO. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1882 Session I, J-01

PETITION OF DEFERRED-PAYMENT & AGRICULTURAL SETTLERS IN THE PROVINCIAL DISTRICT OF OTAGO. Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1882 Session I, J-01