E.—6d.
1875. NEW ZEALAND.
NEW ZEALAND ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH CABLE, (FURTHER PAPERS RELATING TO).
Presented to both Souses of the General Assembly by Command of Sis Excellency.
No. 1. Despatch from the Eight Hon. the Seceetaet of State for the Colonies to His Excellency the Goyebnob of New Zealand. (No. 45.) Mt Loed, —■ Downing Street, 24th July, 1875. I enclose for your information a copy of a letter addressed to me by Sir Julius Vogel and Sir D. Cooper in regard to the contract into which they have entered, as representatives of New Zealand and New South Wales respectively, with the Eastern Extension, Australasia, and China Telegraph Company, for the construction and laying of a submarine cable between New South Wales and New Zealand. I also enclose a copy of the reply which I have caused to be sent to them. I have, &c, Governor the Most Honorable Cabkabvon. The Marquis of Normanby, K.C.M.G.
Enclosure 1 in No. 1. Sir J. Vogelj and Sir D. Cooper to the Earl of Cabnabvon. Mt Loed, — London, June, 1875. We have the honor to enclose, for vour Lordship's information, two copies of the contract which, as representatives of New Zealand and New South Wales respectively, we have negotiated with the Eastern Extension, Australasia, and China Telegraph Company (Limited). 2. From that document you will learn that, on condition of the payment hy New Zealand of £5,000, and by New South Wales of £2,500, a year, for teu years, the Company covenant to construct and lay, without delay, a submarine cable between Sydney and some point on the north or north-west coast of the Middle Island of New Zealand; that the tariff shall not exceed 7s. 6d. for a message of ten words, and 9d. for each additional word; and that those rates shall be reduced when the number of messages averages two hundred a day. 3. As your Lordship is aware, the Eastern Extension Company own the line which connects Northern Australia with Madras, and therefore with the cable-system of Great Britain and other parts of the world. The present rate for messages between England and Adelaide is £9 Gs. 6d. for twenty words; of which the South Australian Government receive £1 for the Trans-Continental route, the Government of Java 45., the Government of India Bs., the Eastern or the Indo-European Company (whichever is employed between India and London) £2 65., and the Eastern Extension Company the balance, £5 Bs. 6d. This heavy charge has been felt in the Australasian Colonies to be a great hardship, especially seeing that no message can be sent for less than the twenty-words rate, and that no additional charge for less than ten words is recognized. There have consequently been negotiations for the establishment of a second through route, but they have not been successful. 4. "We have desired, in negotiating the present contract, not to strengthen the Company in the possession of a monopoly ; whilst we have felt that, considering the small population of the Australian colonies, they should be content without a second route, if the Company were willing to make reasonable terms for reducing the through rates. We had besides satisfied ourselves that a second line could only be established and maintained at an exceedingly heavy cost. We made it a point, therefore, while negotiating for a cable connecting New Zealand with Australia, to procure from the Company a covenant to reduce the present through rate between England and Australia, on condition that the colonies agreed to pay a certain subsidy. 5. Prior to the present arrangement being discussed there were negotiations between the Company and some of the colonies for a reduction of the rate between Port Darwin and England; the Company offering to agree to a reduction for messages between Port Darwin and London to £3 ss. for ten words, and Cs. 6d. per word additional, for a subsidy of £25,000 yearly. The Company have I—F. 6b.
E.—6d
2
now agreed to terms which are better for the colonies —namely, that upon the colonies undertaking to pay £20,000 a year for ten years (in addition to the subsidy payable for the New Zealand cable), there shall be a reduction to £3 for ten words, and 6s. per word additional, between Port Darwin and England, besides a corresponding reduction on the rates between Australia and Java and India. Seeing that, under such an arrangement, the Eastern Extension Company would not receive more than £1 9s. for the transmission of ten words between Port Darwin and Madras, instead of the £5 Bs. 6d. they now receive for twenty words, the arrangement seems to us to be a very reasonable one. 6. It becomes now of importance to make up the subsidy of £20,000 a year for ten years. We think that the commercial interests of this country in Australasia are so large aud important, besides that the Imperial Government, and especially the Colonial Department and the Admiralty, have frequent occasion to use the telegraph, that your Lordship might see your way to agree to pay a small portion of the subsidy. We mil not disguise that we attach more importance to your Lordship agreeing to become a contributor to the subsidy than to the amount you may agree to contribute. There has always been difficulty in uniting the Australasian Colonies in any arrangement; and we cannot but think that if the Imperial Government could be induced to bear part of the charge which this subsidy will entail, that difficulty would be very much lessened. 7. But whilst we thus frankly state our views, we would respectfully submit to your Lordship that it is only equitable that the Imperial country should defray part of the subsidy ; since not only would residents in Great Britain enjoy a moiety of the advantages of the reduced through rates between England and the colonies, but Her Majesty's Government, in communicating with the colonies and with the squadron on the Australasian Station, would save a considerable sum yearly. The Imperial Government will not, of course, be interested in the reduction between the colonies and Java and India. 8. Under these circumstances we hope your Lordship will be able to agree to the Imperial Government contributing £3,000 a year towards the subsidy, leaving the colonies to make up between them the remaining £17,000 a year. We have, <fec, Julius Vogel. The Eight Hon. the Earl of Carnarvon, &c, &c. Daniel Coopeb.
Enclosure 2 in No. 1. The Colonial Office to Sir J. Vogel and Sir Daniel Coopeb. Sib,— Downing Street, 19th July, 1875. I am directed by the Earl of Carnarvon to transmit to you for your information a copy of a letter from the Board of Treasury, conveying their Lordships' decision on the question submitted in the letter addressed by yourselves to this department in June last, in connection with the contract entered into with the Eastern Extension and China Telegraph Company, for the laying of a submarine cable between Sydney and New Zealand. I have, &c, Sir Julius Vogel, K.C.M.G., and Sir Dauiel Cooper. W. B. Malcolm. Sub-Enclosure to Enclosure 2 in No. 1. The Teeasuet to the Colonial Office. Sib, — Treasury Chambers, Mth July, 1875. The Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury have had before them Mr. Malcolm's letter of the 7th instant, transmitting, copy of a letter Sir J. Vogel and Sir D. Cooper, as representatives of New Zealand and New South Wales, have addressed to the Colonial Office in regard to a contract which they have negotiated with the Eastern Extension, Australasia, and China Telegraph Company for the construction and laying of a submarine cable between Sydney and some point on the north or north-west coast of the Middle Island of New Zealand. Mr. Malcolm points out that provision has also been made in the contract for the reduction of the present rates charged upon messages between Australia (Port Darwin) and this country, contingent on the Company receiving a subsidy of £20,000 a year for a term of ten years, towards which Sir J. Vogel and Sir D. Cooper trust the Imperial Government will contribute a sum of £3,000 a year, the remaining sum of £17,000 a year being made up by the Australian colonies and New Zealand. I am commanded to request that you will inform the Earl of Carnarvon that my Lords learn with much satisfaction that measures have been taken by which the important colony of New Zealand will be brought into telegraphic communication with the mother country, and that they agree in opinion with his Lordship that " there can be no question that a great boon would be conferred upon the public if steps could be taken to effect a reduction in the present cost of telegraphic communication between this country and Australia," but I am at the same time to observe that, for some years past, it has been the invariable practice of the Imperial Government to decline to be parties to any grant being made by way of subsidy to telegraph companies. I am therefore directed to express their Lordships' regret that, whilst offering no opinion as to the course of action which the Colonial Governments concerned may wish to take in the matter, they would not feel themselves warranted in calling upon Parliament to make an exception on the present occasion. I have, &c, E. G. W. Herbert, Esq., Colonial Office. William Law. By Authority : Geobge Didseuey, Government Printer, Wellington. —1875. Price 3d.]
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1875-I.2.2.2.14
Bibliographic details
NEW ZEALAND ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH CABLE, (FURTHER PAPERS RELATING TO)., Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1875 Session I, F-06d
Word Count
1,573NEW ZEALAND ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH CABLE, (FURTHER PAPERS RELATING TO). Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1875 Session I, F-06d
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.