Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image
Page image

G.—sc.

1874. NEW ZEALAND.

APARIMA, KAWAKAPUTAPUTA, AND ORAKA RESERVES, (REPORT BY MR. A. MACKAY RESPECTING).

Presented to loth Souses of the General Assembly by command of Sis Excellency. No. 1. Mr. A. Mackat to the TJndeb Seceetaet, Native Department. Sib, — Invercargill, 25th March, 1874. In pursuance of the instructions contained in your letter No. 75, of 2nd February, I visited Eiverton for the purpose of adjusting the dispute that had arisen between the Corporation and the Natives as to the rights of the latter to the foreshore contiguous to the Native reserve, and to the power of the Native authorities to form roads through the property. I reached Eiverton on the evening of the 10th ultimo, and convened a meeting the following day to discuss the various subjects of dispute. The meeting was largely attended by the resident Natives, and the matters of dispute were fully discussed. The chief points contested by them with regard to their right to the foreshore was, that by the 2nd article of the Treaty of Waitangi, the " Chief and Tribes of New Zealand, and the respective families and individuals thereof, were confirmed and guaranteed in the full, exclusive, and undisturbed possession of their land, &c," and that the reserves within the Murihiku Block were lands over which the Native tenure had never been extinguished, and consequently were within the purview of the aforesaid terms. They were therefore fully justified in asserting an exclusive right to the foreshore, in support of which they produced the original plan of the reserve, and further asserted that Mr. Mantell had distinctly promised them the foreshore in 1853, as a landing-place for their boats. In opposition to the points raised by the Natives, it was contended in reply, that their argument in regard to the rights conferred by the Treaty of Waitangi did not go far enough ; that the article in question simply guaranteed undisturbed possession of their lands so long as the owners desired to retain the same in their own possession, and did not apply in this case, as they had voluntarily ceded all their claims to the Crown under the Murihiku Deed of Cession —the reserves in their occupation being a matter of subseqent arrangement. The deed of cession was then read to the meeting, the part having reference to the point in question being as follows: —" And whereas we have agreed entirely to give up our land lying within the boundaries hereunder. ######### " Now these are the boundaries of the land which have been alienated. The boundary commenced at Milford Haven (the name given to that place in Mr. Kemp's deed is Wakatipu, but by the Maoris it is called Piopiotahi), thence to Kaihiku, thence to Tokata (the Nuggets), strictly following the old boundary line of Messrs. Kemp and Symonds, and by the coast from Milford Haven round to Tokata, with Tamaka, Earatoka, Motopui, and all the islands lying adjacent to the shore (excepting the Euapuke Group), and all the lands within those boundaries, with the anchorages and landing-places, with the rivers, the lakes, the woods and the bush, with all things whatsoever within those places, and all things lying thereupon. A more accurate description and representation of the land is given in the plan hereunto annexed. " All the lands and all other things above enumerated, and which lie between the boundaries above recited, have been entirely surrendered to Her Majesty the Queen for ever and ever." This, it was argued, was conclusive evidence of the full and entire surrender of all their claims to the land within the above-described boundaries, and that consequently the reserves within the Murihiku Block were not lands withheld from sale, but were merely portions set apart for their use and occupation, and as such did not come within the category of lands to which the Treaty of Waitangi applied. The Natives, however, took exception to this view of the matter, on the ground that the reserves were made prior to the cession of the surrounding land to the Crown, and could not, therefore, have been included in the sale. But in contravention of this it was pointed out that the position of the land to be set apart for them was merely defined in the first place, and that there was no absolute dedication made until the deed of cession was formally executed. It transpired during the discussion that the idea to claim the foreshore had been engendered in their minds by rumours that had reached them from the North Island of similar claims having been preferred by the Natives at the Thames and other places, and that this had led them to assert what they deemed to be their rights in the matter. In reply to this, it was pointed out that the custom hitherto respecting land between high and low watermark had been to consider that when the Native

G.—sc

2

title was extinguished over the main land, that any supposed rights which the Native owners had over the tidal lands ceased. The rumours that had reached them from the North Island on the subject had reference to cases where the mainland was held under Native tenure; but even then the usufructuary rights of the Natives over the tidal lands had not been allowed to interfere with the Crown's prerogative, which included, inter alia, the dominion over the foreshore. The Natives, on the assumption of British sovereignty over the Islands of New Zealand, became British subjects, and thereon all former dominion, if any existed, was extinguished; it was clear, therefore, that it was useless on their part to assert any rights antagonistic to the Crown's prerogative, which could only end in being upset before a proper tribunal. My arguments, however, met with considerable opposition, and after two days' discussion, finding it would avail nothing to prolong the subject, I consented as a matter of policy to abandon the question, giving them to understand at the same time that they could not maintain an exclusive right to the foreshore, and that if they were unwise enough to take any action to interfere with the general use of the beach by the public, they would do it at their own risk, and must abide by the consequences. All they could claim was a right in common with others to the use of the beach as a landing-place, or for any other legitimate purpose, but they must not attempt to fence it in. With reference to their assertion that they were entitled to the foreshore by the original plan of the reserve, the one produced at the meeting simply gave them a right to high watermark. The plan in question was one that had been furnished them by Mr. Mantell, when he made the reserves : and I had also learnt from him, when passing through Wellington on my way South, that the original boundaries of the reserves were correctly shown on these plans, and furthermore that he had carefully avoided making the Natives any concessions that would have ultimately interfered with the future settlement of the district. Judging from the appearance of affairs during the discussion of this question, there seemed to be an under-current influencing the Natives to oppose a denial of their rights to the foreshore; and from all I could learn, their conduct in the matter from the commencement had been actuated by the same cause. Their position, however, was so fully explained to them, that they cannot urge a want of knowledge of it as a plea for persisting in the assertion of this illusory claim. The difficulty concerning the Ferry has passed away; by shifting the crossing higher up the stream, and in course of time when the bridge now being constructed across the river is open for traffic, the present plan will fall into disuse. Concerning the dispute about the destruction of the ferry-house, the Natives to a certain extent were justified in the course they adopted, the building being upon their land, and occupied without their permission, although they went too far in asserting their rights. With reference to wharfage accommodation for the port, the present intention is to build a wharf down stream, off the new bridge, a project which does not find favour with all the residents ; and it is probable, in consequence of the inconvenience now felt from the want of accommodation, that the Corporation will undertake the construction of a wharf in a more suitable position between the new bridge and the Native reserve by reclaiming part of the foreshore ; and for that purpose a grant of the land should be applied for by that body. The only roads set apart for public purposes in the reserve is Paddock Street to the beach, and the longitudinal road running parallel with the beach in the direction of Invercargill. These lines exhaust the quantity of land that can fairly be claimed for the purpose, as the deed of cession only empowers the Government to take one line of road through the property. The chain reserve (as shown on former plans along the beach frontage) has been abolished, as it is not requisite, and while it existed gave rise to questions likely to lead to an infraction of the rights of the Natives, the boundary of their land, as originally set apart, being high watermark. With reference to the longitudinal road through the reserve, it is unfortunate for the interests of the owners that it has (owing to the difficulty of constructing a line nearer to the beach) to be taken at so great a distance inland as to cause a considerable severance, thereby rendering the piece cut off between the road and the beach comparatively useless, as the poor character of the land and the increased distance to fence puts all possibility of using it to advantage out of the question. If this line of road could be abolished or shifted close to the beach frontage, one line of fencing, at a cost of about £100, along the frontage of the reserve, would suffice. But as the matter now stands, it will necessitate an outlay of three times that amount before the outer strip can be utilized. In consideration, therefore, of the increased expense the owners will be put to in enclosing it, I beg to recommend that a sum of £200 be authorized for the purpose. After the foreshore question had been fully discussed, several days were subsequently spent in endeavouring to obtain the assent of the Natives to have the land subdivided, preparatory to the issue of Crown grants to the survivors of those named in the census taken by Mr. Mantell in 1852 as residents of Aparima, and to the nearest representatives of those deceased. The of the Natives in 1852 for whom the land was set apart being the basis of operation, it was necessary in the first place to investigate the right of succession to the claims of the deceased Natives included in the list. On this being done, the next step was to obtain the concurrence of the people interested to some general plan of subdivision ; but owing to their unwillingness to meet each other in a spirit of mutual accommodation, considerable difficulty and loss of time were experienced at the outset. lam glad, however, to be able to report that I succeeded in the end in laying off with their consent the whole of the reserve for occupation, and append hereto an abstract of the parcels, with the names of the respective allottees. I telegraphed you on the 16th February, to the effect that it appeared unadvisable to obtain the assent of the Natives to bring the reserves enumerated in your letter of the 2nd ultimo under the operation of the Native Eeserves Act, as that would bar the issue of Crown grants to the Natives in the fulfilment of promises; and judging by the tenor of your reply of the following day that the matter had been left to my discretion, I refrained from following a course which appeared to be unnecessary and likely to complicate matters, the Native title having already been extinguished over the reserves

3

G.— sc,

at the general cession of the territory in 1853. Had this not been the case, however, bringing the land under the operation of the Native Eeserves Act would not have assisted in solving the^question, as the Act of last year contains no provision for issuing titles to Native owners. It is true that this could be done under the Act of 1862, clause 5, if sufficient time remained to do so before the repeal of the Act; but should this take place before the issue of the grants, the Act of 1873 containing no such provisions, would effectively bar all further proceedings ; for although clause 3 of the last Act saves existing contracts entered into before the repeal of the former Acts, the issue of Crown grants to Native owners does not come within the meaning of the clause, the words used being applicable only to contracts made for the occupation or disposition of land under the provisions of former Acts. Neither do clauses 37 and 38 of the Act of 1873 empower the Native Land Court to issue Crown grants to the owners in event of questions of title being referred to it, but simply to determine the title or interest of persons claiming the land, as a means of assisting the officer authorized to obtain the assent of the Natives to bring lands under the operation of the Act; and on all the necessary requirements being complied with, the land becomes vested in the Native Eeserves Commissioner subject to the provisions of the Act. "The Crown Grants Act, 1862, No. 2," appears to be the most applicable, as it gives the Governor power to issue Crown grants to Natives in fulfilment of promises, whether there is evidence in writing or not of such contracts. This Act will probably be found to contain ample power for the purpose without passing a special one, as it was never intended to limit the power to fulfil to contracts or promises made under authority of law. Having received permission to employ a surveyor to subdivide the land, I applied to the Survey Department at Invercargill to be allowed the services of one of the District Surveyors, and after some little delay succeeded through the instrumentality of the Inspector of Surveys, Mr. Baker, in obtaining the services of Mr. John Hay for the work, on the understanding that I was to make terms with him on the same scale as with a private surveyor. On these conditions I made arrangements with Mr. Hay to execute the necessary work at £4 per diem and find labour. All traces of the subdivisional survey executed in 1865, by direction of Mr. Heale, being entirely obliterated, it was necessary to commence the work de novo; but owing to the Natives having given up all hopes of the Government undertaking the apportionment of the land, they had adopted divisions of their own making, and in some cases had erected houses on the parcels so claimed. It was rather difficult in the first place to devise a scheme of partition that would give entire satisfaction, however, well planned, as the occupants were altogether opposed to any interference with existing interests. A provisional survey had consequently to be undertaken to determine the portion of the enclosures and houses of the occupants, so as to allow each individual to see how his original holding would be affected by the final apportionment; but notwithstanding this precaution, and their subsequent concurrence in the plan of subdivision submitted for their approval, they proved so clamorous and disputatious on the land being finally laid off, that I found it necessary to be present on the ground the whole time, to insure the enconomical carrrying out of the work. The proportion of available land in the reserve being limited to 360 acres, the original intention to allow each individual ten acres could not be carried out, there being 48 claimants to provide for; the quantity therefore had to be reduced to seven and a half acres. A portion of the swamp at the eastern end of the reserve being wholly unsuitable at present for the purpose of husbandry, has not been included in the general partition. The strip of land adjacent to the Beach, and running parallel to the Invercargill Eoad, has also been excluded for the same reason. These parcels contain an aggregate area of 118| acres, and it is proposed to utilize the land for pastoral purposes, and with this view to vest it in trustees for the benefit of all, and the following persons have been chosen with that object, viz.,— Eawiri Te Awa, of Oraka. James Wikoon, half-caste, "} Hoani Paororo, ' ( ~ . David Pratt, half-caste, C ot APanmaCharles Goodwilly, half-caste, J A reserve containing over an acre has been set apart on the beach frontage as a landing-place for the use of the whole of the Native community in the Southland District. The same trustees were chosen for this land. An acre has also been set apart as a Church and School Eeserve, and three and a half acres for a cemetery. The trustees chosen for these parcels are Horomona Patu, of Eiverton, and George Howell. It was not intended in the first place to have included Sections 79 and 81, containing an aggregate area of 111 acres 2 roods 7 perches in the scheme of partition, the land being unsuitable for cultivations ; but the limited area of average land available for allotment amongst the resident Natives made it necessary that a portion of it (Section 79) should be divided amongst the absentees in satisfaction of the whole of the awards. The question of utility also was not of so much consequence to them, as they own land in other localities. But as the cost of utilizing this land, should they ever require to do so, would be altogether out of their reach, without it could be carried out by joint enterprise, which is very improbable, I would beg to recommend the following proportions for favourable consideration: — Ist. That Sections 79 and 81 should be sold, and the proceeds invested in the purchase of more suitable land in another locality. The land so obtained to be divided amongst the allottees on Section 79 in the quantities allotted to each, and the remainder to be apportioned amongst the persons named in Schedule B, in final satisfaction of the quantity formerly intended for each claimant in the enumeration of 1852. 2. Or, if an advantageous sale could not be effected, that the Government should take over the sections in question, and give an equivalent in land elsewhere. The same principle to be carried out with regard to the allottees and others interested as recommended in No. 1. The quantity to be given in exchange should not be less than 150 acres, to enable the proposition to be carried out in its integrity.

G.—sc

4

With reference to the description of title by which the persons to whom the Aparima Eeserve has been apportioned should in future hold their lands, I would beg to recommend, with a view to establish exclusive individual interests in the soil, that the present mode of tenure should be superseded by issuing to each allottee a Crown grant, making the land absolutely inalienable excepting by lease for twenty-one years. This restriction would effectually prevent the grantees from parting with the land except in the prescribed manner, and is preferable, in my opinion, to an entail, as the latter condition, in the case of a Maori, diminishes the value of the land for occupation under lease ; a Maori life being much below the average. A distinction might be made in regard to the grants to be issued for Sections 79 and 81, to enable the land to be disposed of, by making it alienable only to the Crown. I visited the reserves at Oraka and Kawakaputaputa, for the purpose of carrying out the same principle of subdivision amongst the claimants as the one adopted in the case of the Aparima Eeserve, but found the land altogether unsuitable for the purpose. I therefore suggested to the Natives interested, that the best plan to adopt in their case would be to select trustees to whom the land could be granted, in trust for the whole, on the same conditions as the grants proposed for the Aparima Eeserve, and that the trustees should execute a declaration of trust setting forth the purpose for which they hold the land, to which a Schedule containing the names of the whole of the claimants should be attached. In accordance with my suggestion the following persons were elected by the Natives as trustees, namely,— Eawiri Te Awa, *) EewSlkau, (** (hebs. John Poko, J Haimona Pakipaki, TioJLSu,' For Kawakaputaputa. John Wesley Hauraki, ) The same principle in regard to the original claimants to these reserves was carried out as at Aparima, and a supplementary list made of other Natives whom they chose to admit besides. In the case of the reserve at Orutota a place lying a few miles to the westward of Kawakaputaputa, the area being small and the number of claimants few, I would beg to recommend that a grant should issue in favour of the whole of the persons interested under the same restrictions as recommended in other cases. I annex the under-mentioned Schedule for general information: — A. List of the Aparima Natives named in Mr. Mantell's census of 1852, with the names of those chosen to succeed to the claims of those deceased. Also, the particulars of the award made in each case. B. List of quantities awarded to the respective allottees. C. List of Natives who will require Crown grants prepared, under the present apportionment. D. List of Oraka Natives named in Mr. Mantell's census, and the names of those chosen to succeed. Also a supplementary list of Natives who have been admitted by the claimants to share in the reserve. E. List of the Kawakaputaputa Natives, &c, &c. F. List of Natives entitled to the Onetota Eeserve. A plan of the recent survey of the Aparima Eeserve will be furnished so soon as I can obtain a copy for the purpose. The work has been completed at a cost of £72, for which a voucher will be forwarded for approval. I have, &c., Alexandeb McKat, Commissioner.

G.—5c.

Enclosure No. 1. APARIMA RESERVE.— SCHEDULE A.

5

Eettten showing the Apportionment oi .panma ;eserve amongsi ;he Survivors or the of those Deceased. 'riginai .aimam ;s, am ersons em ;o sueceei ares No. of Claim. Name of Original Claimant. Name of Person chosen to Succeed. No. of Acres Awarded. How Disposed of. Eemarks. 1 2 3 Paororo Hoani Paororo Matiaha Kukeke (dead) EewetiteAkau A. E. P. 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 Allotted Section 68, containing 7a. 32p. Allotted Sections 3, 5, 7, 27, and 28, containing 7a. 2r. 4p. Allotted Section 76, containing 8a. This section was made a little larger owing to the land being Bwanipy. 4 5 6 Meihana te Aowhira (dead) Haimona Pukepaki ... Karipa Haimona Paororo 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 Allotted Sections 61, 62, 63, and 64, containing 9a. lr. 26p. Allotted Sections 32, 33, and 39, containing 8a. 12p. Allotted 7a. 3r. 9p. in Section 71 This claimant is named Karipa te Whareherehere in the original census. 7 8 Nathaniel Kurukuru (dead) G-eorge Grrey Kawaru Eiria Taramiki 7 2 0 None Allotted 7a. 2r. 33p. in Section 69. Claimant left the place many years ago, —not heard of since; no issue. 9 10 11 12 13 14 George Wera Moses Tia Tipo (dead) TeMohene (dead) ... Ihaka Taiepa (dead) ... JohnPoko... Toto . ... No issue William Davis (h.o.) ... TokeEeko ... 7 2 0 None 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 Allotted 7a. 2r. 33p. in Section 69. Allotted 8a. lr. 9p. in Section 66. Allotted 8a. in Section 79 Allotted 8a. in Section 78 Allotted 4a. 2r. 39p. in Section 78 Native of Sandwich Islands. Enlarged on account of swampy nature of land. Claimant named Hoani Matewai in original list. Claimant named Hoani Wai in original list —takes balance of shares in Section 79 (3a. 2r. 21p.) 15 Karipa Pohau (dead)... MereTitahi... 7 2 0 Allotted Sections 58, 59, and 60, containing 21a. 19p., in satisfaction of this claim and two others. Allotted 8a. in Section 79 Allotted Sections 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 16a, 17, 17a, 18,19, 21, 23, 24, and 26, containing an aggregate area of 21a. lr. 25p., and 7a. lr. 28p. of Section 65 : in all, 28a. Sir. 15p. Allotted Section 52, containing 2a. 2r. lip., and Section 75, containing 5a. 2r. 38p.: in all, 8a. lr. 9p. Allotted 8a. in Section 79 Allotted 7a. 2r. in Section 70 ... 16 17 John Miller (h.e.) Horomona Pukuheti ... 7 2 0 7 2 0 Land swampy. This claimant and his daughter Mary King are entitled to four shares between them. v Pokunukunu (dead) ... James and William Bates (h.o.) 7 2 0 Claim enlarged owing to swampy nature of Section 75. 18 19 20 John Tapui (dead) ... Patoromu Pu TuEawiri ... 7 2 0 7 2 0 Land swampy. Tbis claimant is named Bartholomew Hapaimoko in original census. 21 22 23 24 25 26 Pikau (dead) Henry Johnson (dead) Aperahama Kaimata (dead) Te Weha ... Eeihana Pinana Jauies Leada Mary King ... Caroline Church and John Mi ... Ellen Brown 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 7 2 0 Shares with her father, Horomona Pukuheti. Allotted 10 acres in Section 74 Allotted 14a. 3r. 14p. in Section 65 Allotted 7a. 2r. 15p. in Section 70. Allotted 8a. lr. 9p. in Section 66. Made larger owing to swampy land. This claimant is entitled to two shares. Sarah Wixon (h.c.) ... Shares Sections 1 and 2 with his sisters, Eliza G-reen and Elizabeth Arnett. 27 28 Tiki Karaweko Pirihira Pako 7 2 0 7 2 0 Allotted 7a. 3r. 9p. in Section 71. Allotted 5a. 3r. 35p. in Section 57 This section was made this size by arrangement with Hoani Paororo, acting for Pirihira Pako.

G.—sc

6

TO "I a OJ • Ph "a a ■& 'S o _3 a r= OJ f-t o a o 0J a B rH OJ 1 a .2 HH 3 a a . 'r-t 00 ea a ■■■« 0J -a ° B bo II 03 OJ co pO t-a .15 HH a ° s a to S.-2 a a 2 DO rrj # g S 'm *3 s e C3 S ° rT, IS rS.2 O h9 -2 r, a a a .3 O 'S'*.g - ■— —' to5 S cj o ■S 3^ §•2 I 3 Or2 o Ph a | to a a rH .3 I" a .CJ &**} O n3 fc>3H .2 a co a a cj a^ 43 O Pi * 03 00 r*^, 0J 43 ■ '3 »3 no o3 g CT'OO 1 „«> Hi o co o _ CO CO CO r/o a ■ a 8 S h3 bo HH CO o _ a.3 a •a Jl li .s © 03 rO 'o o O CD ■*-» « O o m a co J JgH CD CH CO "S a'! a Hfi # CO S £ •rH s CO I CO c*a 03 rH o co O Ph o IE) c m O a. s o o j> a co HH CO OJ to .3 a co na co ~% oo CO r\ rH a ■a a bo a 1 H) . a oo o CO CO aco" o ia n* rri o ;c c 3 03 03 aia — Ift dr-f CO TO . a !h O CMa oo J>03 rO Tj &S °° : : : i 3 gts to 2 oo a boK fc, a ■: ja'afl„c0HH'^„a o HH 1D -e = : : eg - SiS'8,9l a at* a -a boN 53 .2 a 2 15 * 2-a § S a-5 if .a ra g 8 •" & - s •■§ a fiiSfSpair^fy® g Sg i g a-N-2 -g Ml to 0co-2| il li J l;,M ffij g^3^ .« a 3 '3:a*r3.-s 0 tr §2l-S^^a c hP.h cmim r^ hS.S»S3k— 'acgcBgSsgd^o P.e3 3 .acocDiM co. "a «3n ••-; to 3 arir^ 0'^H3*3 os j -a-HrcS-^SKgagSSS m K to o» os a a a ih « «r3 S.S *nS • r •■fl S 2&t.C; bog S coj>coo J>rH ri . f.ao:S ™ to a "9 « * vfi 4?h ri a E g rarrjrora ran-J ra CD £>ra r= £»£>-« O 4^ cE t> 2 2 X k" CO "C V0| m 'C rk 'k CJOOOJOO OOOJ 00 "r'0Jw,'rH.^0J"HiH l HrH^3HCDr.4Hoa ■—ihO.H r2r2r2r2 r2-S | "J | jS | g g | ,g 1 J £ .9 S€ 1 9 Sfl 8 S 8 H H H H HH H O^"^ 03 &&<i O^feH C3 J Sh C3 Ph O r3 HH Cm O HH 3 CO i _o SH o Ph 3 TO OJ . *h rri CO OJ <Jrg hh a 6 |S rH ri 0 Him OO CM IM ooo© CM CM CM CM OO N (M O CM O OOOOO CM CM CM CM CM CM O CM O CM O CM O CM o h2 < j> J>l> 9>1>1>J> 1>1> 1> *»9>J>J>.I>i> i> £- 1> 1> CD 3 "I o r3 ai • • DO : : <o % 1 Ph d B '/j o 15 9 o o JO CJ p i PHtO CO HH CO a o r>l r3 a °Ph »s .h 8 a PhW T3* ■ : § a ■•■$ g a -a 2 a § 11 o W rH O^ aW a | a- co 3r MS 6 o 43 o EH bO | 02 ifl oo i 43 -^ -rS - - : °. : a : : cE -g £ Ph 3 CJ H | 'S o rS W © I HH a a .a a O "a .3 to j O hh O CO a a I 1 Ph u PH I 91 H* r?^ 3h *g ; : ; : : ca 03 . . . . . co rS PS rrj n —' . O O 03 >H o 9 o3 .2 C3 —j 3 03 O Hill H o £> **Z' Cut} S Ph 03 — "S* *fi s a §fh b« B ♦HrnHEH rnH S lis : : : : ri u • • • «| o :„2 wa ■-H -S»g 3 3 a 5 § "3 co a a.K.g -g g B S H PS Ph r? B SH O I OJ M o I 0J E B * 'pi' 0J I E O H hj % u 6 rrj 03 OJ rH a B ■s a 1 I h OJ o3 B h^ 43 Q | H "8 J 03 CM OH CO CO CM CO ■* lft CO CO CO CO CD1> CO CO CO CO OO O rH CM CO ■* CO 1ft CD $1 0Q

G.—5c.

Enclosure No. 2. APARIMA RESERVE.—SCHEDULE B.

7

;etui ai in showing the Q part for General P ace with the origi: iensus of 1852. lantit1 irpos* lal im r ot .Land IB. Also, tl ;ention to a allotted to i he Number dlow Ten (: iach Claimant, together with the Parcels set Df Acres still due to each Claimant in accord.0) Acres to each Individual named in the No. of Claim. Name of Claimant. No. of Shares. Quantity Allotted. Quantity still Due. Remarks. 1-4 2-31 3 5 6-32 7-29 17-42 9 11 12 13 14-37 15-39-45 16 18 19 20 21-41 22 Paororo ... John Paororo Eeweti te Akau Haimona Fakipaki... Karipa Haimona ... Eiria Taramiki Horomona Pukuheti Q-eorge Wera William Davis Toke Beko John Poko Toto MereTitahi 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 A. E. P. 16 2 18 12 0 3 8 0 0 8 0 12 15 3 9 15 2 33 14 1 15 7 2 33 8 19 8 0 0 8 0 0 16 1 20 21 0 19 A. E. P. 3 1 22 7 3 37 2 0 0 1 3 28 4 6 31 4 17 5 2 25 2 17 1 2 31 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 2 20 8 3 21 John Miller "... James and Wm. Bates Tu Eawiri Patoromu Pu Mary King Caroline Church and John Mi Ellen Brown TeWeha... Sarah Wixon Tiki Karaneko PirihiraPako Parapa ... Mere Haimona Ann Williams Caroline G-oodwilly and James Wiwil Mary Hokopu Elizabeth Sterling ... John Arnett Elizabeth Mi Leader's Family 1 1 1 1 2 1 o \j \j a \j \j 7 2 0 2 2 0 8 0 0 8 19 8 0 0 7 2 0 14 1 14 10 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 31 2 0 0 2 2 0 5 2 26 14 1 14 5 2 26 10 0 0 23-43 24 25 27 28 30 33 34 35 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 3 14 5 0 26 7 2 15 2 1 25 8 19 1 2 31 14 3 14 7 2 15 8 19 7 3 9 5 3 35 7 2 34 7 3 9 8 0 6 7 2 24 5 0 26 2 1 25 1 2 31 2 0 31 4 0 5 2 16 2 0 31 1 3 34 2 1 16 7 3 9 2 0 31 5 3 35 4 0 5 7 2 34 2 16 7 3 9 2 0 31 8 0 6 1 3 34 7 2 24 2 1 16 to r\ oo o o o 36 38 40 44 26-46-47-48 1 1 1 1 4 7 0 32 2 3 8 7 2 21 2 1 19 8 0 0 2 0 0 8 16 1 2 34 11 3 32 28 0 8 ! 1 3 24 Nil. 15 0 0 5 0 0 . 15 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 32 7 2 21 8 0 0 8 16 11 3 32 2 3 8 2 1 19 2 0 0 1 2 34 28 0 8 The claimants have been promised 33 acres by the Government at a place called Gummit's Bush, near Riverton. This will satisfy the quantity due to them. A gift to claimant. Although the names of Teone Topi Patuki and Paitu do not appear in the original census, it was considered they had an indisputable right to share in the reserve as chiefs of the tribe. Moreover, they had been admitted by common consent, and a certain area apportioned them in the division made by the resident Natives. The quantity of land held by them under that arrangement proved, on actual survey, to be 39a. 3r. 37p., only about 30 acres of which could be utilized, the remainder being bare sandhills and waste lands. In consideration of their position in the tribe, in conjunction with other circumstances, they were finally allotted two shares each in the present apportionment. Caroline Howell Teone Topi Patuki ... Paitu 2 2 1 3 24 15 0 0 15 0 0 Nil. 5 0 0 5 0 0 Landing Resen Church and Scl Cemetery Resei Reserve for gra re 100I Reserve •ve zing purposes, Section 80a ... „ Section 81b ... 'aste land A. E. P. 1 0 15 10 0 3 2 4 58 3 13 59 3 26 9 3 27 Sandhills and v

G.—sc

8

Enclosure 3. APARIMA RESERVE.— SCHEDULE C.

iETUBN OJ rown rants to e preparei um .er tl e presem .ppori ;ionmen1 No. of Section. Area. Name of Grantee. Sex. Eace. Description. Nature of Grant. Bemarks. 1 A. E. P. 7 1 32 Eliza Q-reen F. H.C. Wife of James Absolom Green, of Eastern Bush, Waiau, Otago Wife of John Arnett (h.c.),Waiau, Otago. Waiau, Otago. Eiverton, Otago. Ditto Ditto Runholder, Eiverton, Otago Ditto Eiverton, Otago Ditto Wife of Charles Hokopu, Aboriginal Native, Eiverton, Otago. Settler, Eiverton, Otago Eiverton, Otago Wife of Wm. Cameron, Eiverton, Otago Eiverton, Otago Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Oraka, Western District, Southland ... Ditto Waiau, Otago Ditto Oraka, Western District, Otago Eiverton, Otago Ditto Ditto. Oraka, Otago Eiverton, Otago Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Land to be inalienable excepting by lease for 21 years Grantees to hold as tenants in common. 2 3 4 5 6 4 2 0 0 2 0 12 0 2 11 1 3 21 Elizabeth Arnett ... James Francis Leader William Daniel te Anotu Same Grantees Hoani Paororo William Stevens William Stevens John Hokopu Mary Hokopu, jun. Mary Hokopu, sen. F. M. M. H.C. H.C. M. M. M. M. F. F. M. E. E. M. M. M. Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto. "\ In trust for John George Stevens, Charles Stevens, and f Eachael Matilda Stevens (half-castes), grandchildren of j Paetu of Aparima, as tenants in common. ■) To be granted to Charles Hokopu, of Eiverton, Aboriginal j Native, in trust for the said grantees, as tenants in common. 7 1 3 21 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 3 21 0 3 0 1 0 21 0 3 18J 0 3 18 0 3 6 0 1 26 [ 0 1 20 George Howell David Pratt Sarah Anne Cameron Horomona Pukuheti Mary King Ditto ... Henry te Huruhuru Horomona Pukuheti Mary King Horomona Pukuheti Tottie Brown Daniel te Anotu Bawiri te Awha Kunu te Awha James Leader John Arnett Pene te Au Horomona Pukuheti Mary King Ditto ... Bawiri te Awa James Wikson Hoani Paororo David Pratt Charles Goodwilly ... Horomona Pukuheti Mary King M. M. M. F. M. M. F. M. F. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. F. H.C. H.C. H.C. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. H.C. H.C. M. M. M. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto Ditto Ditto ... ■ ... Ditto. Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto. Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto. Ditto Ditto Grantees to hold as joint tenants. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. Ditto. 16 0 3 0 17 16a 0 3 o[ 0 1 20 1 Ditto. Ditto. As tenants in common. Ditto. 17a 0 1 20 18 2 12lj Grantees to hold as joint tenants. Ditto. 19 20 2 3 8 1 0 15 M. M. M. M. M. M. H.C. H.C. H.C. M. Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto (Land to be granted in trust as a landing-place for the use of the -whole of the Native community residing in the Southland District. 21 1 2 o[ Grantees to hold as joint tenants. Ditto.

G.—sc.

9

re a a o (3 o -a O (A a .2 « m 0 • to t- O o p. ft Si » & © o rg *» 3 b - ifa. § flj *"* £ & CD * .s_. 1 © ™ 00 fl^ * -3 O ". fn o ■—1 ,, o fl O __02 o £ o > a* H ■^ •___! •» §^ § 6 6 ftfl **s a"^ sa =°c« s § a mbj I-5| °la ft m O 2 =3 O © ai **■*' -fl to ,, M 8>§ § § I* p j a, O 02 ■ a t_H _r fl • . fl o fl -4-1 -^ S H "^l "*^ cm O © _a P o I © © d o3 -o m I .3 © . .j en I g &'•! **. sl r_ oq a a ft TO 49 c3 O ii .2 *o "—3 XD < 6 6 -»_> 4J -M -U ss 1 6 6 -4-3 -+-J 3 i •to 55 I ■s o ■■g o p. p^ . © to g c3 © © a s. C3 _ a ro • |.i -° .•*. -a 3 j?Rfi H_ bo si OOOOO PflPflfl 00000 -m += -U -u -u -u -*J -u -w orrSS a RR 6 R - • -J-> - - ■ ' Ph * ■ CO . II .2 g .3 S "~ 03 ... o_oS^ooooo —1 _j ■a^ -t. t^- *3 "^ "^ ■*-* "^ ft gftS^ftpogft .2 rBM a S HI ft 006000 4_ +_ _J -^ _J ftftftftfift s *^H o a. r-i ca _Z_ +3 02 O .« -^ Li fl 3 Ph a o 6 ft : :<-~* : 9 " : : : : : O | CO P 8 ■*'.*__ 'i o o SO §0 r_-3 a - - J S a :::: :i : ■y* o ia o 5 -g o _D . M O S _0 J ,3 _? £to__ Ooooo^ O o.fc s.O . .3^ . _-*^.r3<_ _ B -s2sa», o a.-aPn fc a oftftftft o M°ft cgS g p p. mfePn ::::-3 nSpT-zj :::: ::::^ :::::: •a ab o Sh S ii -a ■■§ a Bg a « : : : :-4 <^M ° : : : : : : :F :::::: ' ' ' ' . .. o ' " ' _j ' 'a ° •*• . a _j fi . Hk-S' 4 -u,_:-w l _].t> rs.u 1 o'BB a 2 Ml _f-l 11 : DQ :: p H og[_, (D^ d_ :: __ o : o2:S 02:-2o2:o 8& 3 Wgj-p||lrSS sl § |o^o||^ol^o1 o-^Q-^ °.£i_S o'S's c-^ on-a *-3 f __^ c 5*3 P __j r __iV_5 ft ii^lilgiii l-\lihsi'i p^p^ p^^ mp^ p p^p^ p. m p (^ OP^ o o -1^ zfl fl cS 5 fl b o Li o <D © Ssaigaiai aa ;*.a aa d aaga a'a'a'aj_j sassgrfga «4-l O CD o_ :Bi a^'Na %% :Nri S^ a. a'aaa aaa'a^i aa'a^a _i PB B w 6 CD —i 5 ds O <D a |Zi 'S :.'S : : * •_ : : -a : .a ,3 Sf -S s* - O -. M : 50 6_^5 _ J_ § O i_{ .8 "*_ 0_3_5-g_ S. O _ N ff B _3 13 __ 3 a .%■ p. CD *fS iM _^o5^ Fh ■allel «».- -_^ _L -^ .S -*^ AS 3a wa .fl .M O 3 3 a so -. _ -g^rfls .§•_ 1 I gP_ _3 !.■§__ ._ © __ bfi © rfl *-< T5 ■-. I -^is JJJi§ . . •: . 4 . : : : : : o : Si — 5 a a j g h ;__j o g £ £ sjg-sisi P. O W OH CO HO. p3 O iH O (M rH HHIO (M CM <N <M 00 rH rH 00 CO O CM (N (N rH rH rH O O (M rH O O O OT) "^ '<?, r-i CO rH CM CO CM Ci CO •«* rH CO CM rH CO CM CO 10 00 O (M CM CO O H O O O cj ■5 tH H COH rH HHO rH rH rH (M <N rH <M O CO CO CO rH rH r-i rH rH CM rH rH «4h 6 °.i z © G. CM 1 CM CO -*K5 CM CM CM CO J>00 OM CM CM CM CM O CO W CM CO CO CO CO CO 10 CO to t- 00 CO CO CO Co -# "^ n . 10 con 5c—2

G.—sc

10

1 a o 0Q ■a g go •** S .3 s _o to I o o .a S a S CO ■ 1 %SSS *•" -U -*3 -U flPPP O **-3 ■ "4-1 • 0 E A a o 1 a °» 00 a __ .-- -i'S p . I_ a co o Ph . *""a ci ag _ -jx os bh 3^ II M a-S 4| il fsp I a_5 s _a a o^ s^ a o 3 o '-3 ° 0 =* o E co fa al s C CM -H J3 §43 Is § a"- 1 g^B a -_« i* s ■< < 6666066066 4— -ft-i-0-ft-ft.ft-ft-ft-J.o_J -43.+3-ft-ft-ft-ft+3.u3.U.4__ ftftftfififtfiSfift 1 *s «0 I •+3 g a a o . '-£ o p< p. _j : r 1 Ph ... CO . O m M Sj <S> e3 CO 9 ft "-! ,0 ■a 5" .3 S -S-Ofiflftflftft §.3 03 M ft s s ftft Sp 6 s 0000 -ft -ft) -t-> -4-J -_J SSpS 6 ft i 600 +J 4. fifift i o s I 00000 -t3 -^3 +3 -ft> -t3 -t3 -*J -*3 +3 ftftfiftft fl a I O o r^ fl --^ c3 fl CD o ft p. 5 CD ■s fl fl •a CD _ cj P< CD fi Ph d _o '-ft EL 's o © ft • 1 - ! ■ =j i; _ =1-8 § ::•:•::•:::•:: :|" :§ :«::; = = = ;: "a .a •__■£ -g -g .fc 5 :::::■_ :° : <j^« : :I ::::::: :S :J :«:::::::: ft •_; ' -S 1 ' '5 ° •«• 'o '3 - "*< gfi. '3 g '3 ja^ a II o wl 0 ftSlo:sl| | I fll] 1 ll-ilSg l.o x-SoO o o go o go« o^ ft 0 |o h -fc h -a2 o o o.a 02 ,§ f 0 o offlO o t»- © .-£ d "ii Ph h *" n iu «^* (D-^S-^ £iDb.i-i_._._i h5>-= n'-'O - b c -^ ■_> -S d E r ti |i_R Jail's e -|*s.5-g |^ft^ft||g|ftftfi=s||'s c.| t.|ftftft g"^|ft 19 .fc S-s.fcI_-2.fcc!ziS 09 I l9l.fc S^-sS-S-fc^-S vS^.fc CD O •+3 fl o fl o G O <H O © o c3 a a^ft s HW a'S aa a a a gjjjaaapjaajjjjij wHi do WW wwwww^ sw3S P* p CO OQ a a'aa^a'ft a'ft a& a. a a a a a a a" a a a'£ a'fr'aa'aap^a'^ 6 © -ft fl a E o © a i 03 M o e3 c3 •a h-1 S3 I 33-- - -n ■ ■_! : : : m : 13 3 3 —* M^ B^ . §'§.»__ *w a o 3 _a co a a ago a o .a .2 [3 _■ <» oo o es' to. c3 ftB>.ft^O o o Ei 2 co ft .** ftfL, a o .a a o _ h_h_ a : & 3 | H__ -" g IS Wpm EH a - - ."-3... ... """"c3"*'""^"*' S & jfl &0 fl* A fl fl jf-nf. "i 6-a b^ 5* a £> -il aa«w § ° E .a g_i|s,S*aj3gj|g SlgSp^alsfeft t» o C3 O ft* a § _B -Q •lllilil M . d 5H o oB fl _ a |s,S-g_§§.§ s-§.s Ha W Q ha $ C5 P3 Ph P-t P4 pi CM N ffl OH . rH i-i iH CM O CM CO CM CO -H ICO rH (M CM CO O wo CO O CO CO CO CO CO COCMCMOCMcMOO f-i r-i CM CM CM »H CM CMOOOOrHCM CM CM CO o o CO o rH O c3 o •5 -d-" 1 rH rH W0 CM rH CM O 1-110 CM CMi-lr-liHCDlMCM CM CM t- *» CO CM 13 o g Z CO ffl O riMB 00 cot00 00 iro O i-t CM CO *3* lO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CD CO CO CO C3 CO o

11

G.— sc

to a a © Ph fl o 1 a o © fl to © 4JB to -5 si 4J hU-j flfl H 2.5 - a 4 a £ CO 3 B CO"" 3rrl •H TS o g rH 03 03 Q a S-fl fl c^ r^ <-° © oo hh g OH . o '" o^ S §ta^ -a fl © " 03 4-.S 0§ 1 CO ®W -S o O rH fl O o co © © 03 00 o •so °EH aS © •or o TO -3 r," * 03 2 G BrS y © f4 JS © fl^fl 03 43 I'd § to w Hi a a I? H - O oo'fe a oo rH r S^* fH a 3 -h 00cH N HH rr O u M Hi CO . (3-3 03 M " „ 00 ri rr a co 2-3-3 -a a Q O * -« o"2 -^H CO a-3 B 2(j3 50 a co -^ S^-3 CO JO fl .S B- - 3 9a 03 a 3 a .a fi oo a 2 Hi I—( *e3 IM o © co fl © m © tn O i 3 . a io M>i a m 'I s H. 00 bona HH „o a HH O HH QQ m 00 3 > u ■ rt ■» a nsS oj 3 S . . . . S aaoooo §, S S .-a .t3 .t, a S bo-,pppp g, r3 § H 02 K fl 03 a O da P fl o ■ 03 © © •IB ■4J to fl f © to '-£ EH J 3 CJ d o a a _o '-HH fH O Eh ri s B o fH Ph ao +H -H O Ph QO o § H^ a a o © fl SI a' 5 HH .a © (O s Pi : : :-g : : a ~ : : : : : : :l : ,* : : : : : 1 "i- "8 S ft a •* rS HH O 3. :thw tj : 3 m : : : 3<n9 a Fj 3 rj-d a" r-,™°^ a a'Sa -*5 j"ji j. h cn h aa^ &• 3JS£3 g 3 -5^353 I O H§OrHrg 0 °^° o 3|3 M F-irS « P M O^O 4J - ft © © CO M S- © 03 © pS rOrH ' 03 (M |s rfl <HM O© _. to ""^ o3 . . ©©OOO rrj bp 3 3 a ■" fl d 40 s I o 6 6 o Ht-J H- -r-0 flflflfl USS i 5 :•■: =r||§S a.Sgco "S -all .Sa 2 » an - • - -.H!s!m=3 oo-a SN-SSrS n M b. H^ COS 00.2-3° -3 g 0h3O ■a" a« sssssssS \. " g S ° h 3 rO Q QCQ« 3<co g ? COrjcpa Hr-HHhH S U J) S i. rjMr-HOOOj^rjjrj C0a«c8 | •»«"-• |.g _§gC?§r. f -> N^ ' r^ M3 OH? OhS-S g° ofO^ 4J.JH „ -J o O 3 O 'hH o O S - a .-goo iJ R l| I g SO 3 3 3,5 g HFhH^O t3 : : : : 3 a 3 H-) fl. o QQ o o o o -P 4J 4-3 a 5.5 ! .1 Oftpqp E 00 r» 'Ph ■ fl © ■1 h *© rfl 4J CD 60 fl O 1 a C pin O 4^ rt 1 » "S s I O 03 9 rrj % M ■ Si © -£ rfl 2 © &0 rf rrj © 0 © pfl a i*"r. ,2.3 cj "3 g W 11 P 03 i S fl s li a m a a „ -a a 1 &£ CO 03 fl la 03 * J O 03 Hi H 5 3 8 §> M '§ I 4A co feO fl O I © p*- © © © pfl 43 ■m O 44 fl © a a .2 H o Ph © rfl la © I ■ o rH o HH =H d o tH 00 CJ a fl Sh H^S rHhjjS|-rjS wmO'sissjaa 9fl99 : r^l rt jjj ft Fh * a [jjrlirjy " o p H H M 0J 0Q S flrZifl fl^A r^Sr^' gfcgflflSg sdSnaa i © § e> O © a 3 to r- r3 g <3 O co 1 1^1 s -I 3 S fc-,° .3 :g trj 'a fi o a, — 03 03 i-M C5 jh i-S fl M gSrH co j a 1 1 -3 2 a a co a^i HH 3 -H f-j 0 hS .f«lfH S § S fl a H d5 O O Hbribb a a o a ■i.oj.r.1 :-5 r-ligg-S* 5 frSj^rt -B3'& « a o 3 -a a fl rH r-j H fl H fl V §o II g £ -P O 4i P 2"03r? S £ §jg^ s n . P-t m rrj © t-J 1h © a-§ gj a a o J? c^ a C3 © CM CO o cat, OH 00 O O O0 r-i CO CO IM CM O O CM CM CO rH CO CO IN CO . OS H CM t» CO <M rH >a oo co cm H r-i WJ CO oo in "s a o § rH CXI CO "^i lO CDi>03 CO to 00 rH CO

Gh—so

Enclosure No. 4. ORAKA RESERVE.—SCHEDULE D.

12

iETTTEN Of tr succeed t Claimant: ie Oraka Natives included m the Census ot 1852, with the Names of those chosen to ;hose Deceased; also, a Supplementary List of Natives who have been admitted by the s to Share in the Reserve. No. of Claim. Name of Original Claimant. Name of Person chosen to Succeed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Te Au (dead) ... Mare (dead) ... Makaia Eawiri Tamira. Pakuraka Kaikatakata (dead) Paharama Patama (dead) Geo. Wiritia Eakitaotao Horopapera Wera (dead) Te Akau. Eatimira te Au (dead) ... Eawiri te Awa. Watakaui. Akaroa Pohatu (dead) ... Takurua. Hoani Poke (dead) Peterite Kaihouhou (dead) Owenua Maka Tohe. Eairama. Kaihau (dead) Te Euruki (dead) Eena Kaawhi. Eena Kaawhi. Tanahara. Hira Paramatia. Te Ruataeka (dead) Pirihira Waitiri (dead) ... Eamari Poukene (dead) Te Waipunahau (dead) Te Watahi (dead) Te Maka. Rora Penu. Eia Kauharakeke (dead) John Poko. Could not be traced. Eatimira te Au. Absent many years, not been heard of. John Paina (h.c.) William Davis (h.c.) Pene te Akau. Eeihana te Maire. Tamati te Au. Tipene Tutakai. John Wesley, Hauraki. Absent many years, not been heard of. TePi. Could not be traced. Kariata te Au. Matoitoi. Matini te Au. No issue. Could not be traced. Ruruhira. Stjppleme entaet List of Natives who have been admitted by the Claimants to share in the Beserve. Males. Females. John Topi Patuki, jun. Mary Pi. G-eorge Pauti (h.c.) . Eipeka Maihi Tipene. Tame Winiata. Emma Matewai. John Dallas. Te Whareraki. Reweti te Akau. Hannah te Akau. Horopere te Akau. Mary Ann Takurua. Henare Reweti. Pirihira Bawiri. Henry Tupai. Victoria Mauhe. John Tupai. Martha Dallas. Earipa Haimona Pakipaki. Annie te Akau. Henare Huruhuru. Peti te Akau. EAWAKAPUTAPTTTA EESEEVE.—SCHEDULE E. Jetuen of tl: chosen to by the C he Kawakaputaputa Natives included in the Census of 1852, with the Names of those 3 succeed those Deceased ; also, a Supplementary List of Natives who have been admitted Claimants to Share in the Reserve. No. of Claim. Name of Original Claimant. Name of Person chosen to Succeed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 G-eorge Mauhe (dead). Te Manihera, Wairau ... Paku (dead) ... Aperahama Hutoitoi. Kaitahi. Henry Paremata (dead) John Whakaruru. Teopira Tura. Tahu Pohu (dead) Tuwhare (Robert Abraham) Whakahopu (dead) Takataiti (dead). Alfred Kihau. Rawiri te Awa. Haimona Pakipaki. John Stirling. i John Wesley Hamaki.

13

G.—sc

SCHEDULE 5— continued. Eetttbn if the Kawakaputaputa Natives incl ided in the Census of 1852, &c.— continued. No. of Claim. Name of Original Claimant. Name of Person chosen to Succeed. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Te Raki (dead) Hohepa te Watakiore. Takarero (dead) Maxwell Takai (dead) ... Ramiri Kiri. Victoria te Atahura. Ruhia te Rari (dead) Ruti Naki TeKeira Katarina Hine (dead) ... Wikitoria Pepe. Pioni (dead) ... Roka Kuini (dead) Mananakaika (dead) Hinewera (dead) Ria Kurehe. Pirehia (dead) Pitone (dead) Takatake (dead) Ann Williams. Ripeka Tipene Tutakai. Could not be traced. Mary Hokopu. Sarah Wixon (h.c). Elizabeth Stirling (h.c). Paitu. Nanny Tiopira Tuoa. Mere Haimona Pakipaki. Ann Pratt (h.c). Mere Titahi. Could not be traced. Paororo. Martha Waturewa. Stjpplementabt List of Natives who have been admitted by the Claimants to Share in the Eeserve. Males. Daniel te Anotu. John Paina (h.c.) Brown Whiritiri. William te Anotu. John Poko. Charlie te Raki. Hemy Huruhuru. Charlie Kanae. James Leader (h.c.) William Henry Huruhuru. Paniana. William Haimona Pakipaki. James Cooper (h.c.) Hoani Takurua. Reihana Tupai. James Wixon (h.c.) John Hokopu. William Bates. James Wewit (h.c.) George Wera. John Ahi (or Mi). John Arnett (h.c.) William Eisher (h.c.) Isaiah Ahi (or Mi). David Pratt (h.c.) John Fisher (h.c.) William Sterling. Horomona Pukuheti. Charlie Eisher (h.c.) James Wikson, jun. Females. Margaret te Huruhuru. Sarah Mauhe. Agnes Hokopu. Eanny Pinana. Elizabeth Mi. Mary te Anotu. Rawinia te Raki. Caroline Church. Mary King. Emma Matewai. Tamara Paororo. Mary Ann Kairama Takurua. Pirihira te Awa. Hira Hauraki. Alice Eisher (h.c.) Ellen Mauhe. Mary Hokopu. ONETATA RESERVE.—SCHEDULE E. List of Natives in whose favour a Crown Grant of the Onetaha Eeserve should be issued. M. Ratimira te Au ... ...~ M. Matini te Au M. Tamati te Au ... ... i Of Kawakaputaputa, in the District of E. Harriet te Au ... ... f Southland, Aboriginal Natives. M. John Poko M. Karipa Haimona Pakipaki ... _ By Authority: Gbobgb Didsbobt, Goyernment Printer, Wellington.—1874. Trice 1*.]

This report text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see report in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1874-I.2.2.3.13

Bibliographic details

APARIMA, KAWAKAPUTAPUTA, AND ORAKA RESERVES, (REPORT BY MR. A. MACKAY RESPECTING)., Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1874 Session I, G-05c

Word Count
8,996

APARIMA, KAWAKAPUTAPUTA, AND ORAKA RESERVES, (REPORT BY MR. A. MACKAY RESPECTING). Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1874 Session I, G-05c

APARIMA, KAWAKAPUTAPUTA, AND ORAKA RESERVES, (REPORT BY MR. A. MACKAY RESPECTING). Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1874 Session I, G-05c