TRUST COMPANIES
CABLED CORRESPONDENCE MR COATES AND MR Mc.AR.THUR. The following cabled correspondence between Mr J. W. S. McArthur and Mr J. G. Coates has been handed to the United Press Association by Mr McArthur:— Sydney, October 16. To Mr J. G. Coates, — “My attention has been drawn this morning to the New Zealand Herald of October 10 just to hand reporting your statement in the House as follows: — ‘Reports of the proceedings of the Royal Commission in Sydney indicate that the proposals for reconstruction have been submitted to the commission.’ The commissioner’s remarks in relation thereto as recorded on September 26 are as follows:—‘I certainly shall want during the addresses to hear something from counsel on the methods which are proposed to be adopted to carry on these companies, and what is proposed to be done as a basis of my report. I do not know whether Dr Louat was testing my sense of humour when he handed in that scheme of reconstruction that Mr McArthur had prepared or whether he really thought it was a scheme of reconstruction.’ Your statement that the commissioners remarks related to reconstruction proposals is entirely incorrect. The document referred to by him was old and unimportant, having no reference to reorganization proposals, which were not made until October 2, six days later. If you had quoted three lines more this would have been clear, but quotation is tom from its context. You then refer to criticism of the proposals by counsel acting for the Crown, inferring that this was on September 26, the date when the commissioner’s remark was made. Actually it was eight days later. It seems scarcely credible that facts as here set out were not available to you. If the extraordinary course is to be taken of commenting officially on the progress of judicial inquiry, I would ask that care be observed to avoid statements as unrelated to the truth as they are damaging to debenture-holders’ interests. Will you also in fairness take first opportunity to correct mis-statements to which your attention is now drawn?—J. W. S. McArthur.”
Wellington, October 18. To Mr J. W. S. McArthur, Sydney. “With reference to your cable of 16th instant, statement referred to was made by me in answer to question asked .in House. My quotation of the commissioner’s remarks was reproduced verbatim from printed evidence statement numbered 18891, where the commissioner refers to proposals as a scheme of reconstruction prepared by you. Dr Louat certainly claimed it was a skeleton put forward as showing that matter of reorganization had not escaped attention. My references to remarks of counsel assisting commission admittedly refer not to skeleton, but to more detailed scheme submitted by you on October 2. I gather you consider interests of debenture-holders damaged by fact that juxtaposition in my reply apparently attributes to skeleton scheme subsequent comment on detailed scheme. I had no intention of giving that impression, but suggest you authorize me to hand to Press for publication and information of debentureholders’ copies of printed evidence questions 18891 to 18895 relating to skeleton scheme and the whole of the proceedings of the thirtieth sitting on fourth October, giving references to detailed scheme with comments of commissioner and counsel on both sides, together with copy of your cable and this reply. Please cable whether you wish this done. I do not consider my statement in House damaging to deben-ture-holders, but if you consider it was damaging publication suggested would make position clear.—J. G. Coates.
Sydney, October 18. To the Rt. Hon. J. G. Coates.
“‘Your cabled reply admits that the commissioner’s remark had nothing to do with the reconstruction proposals, although you had definitely stated it to be in relation to those proposals. It also admits that the address of counsel assisting the commissioner was delivered eight days afterwards, and on another subject, although your statement had directly inferred the contrary. As to your suggestion that I should authorize you to hand certain portions of the printed evidence to the Press, you need no authorization from me to act as you please. It is certain, however, that the false impression already given by improper comment will only be intensified by any further picking out of portions of the evidence. Action of this kind by a Minister of the Crown during the course of a judicial inquiry is, I am advised, without British precedent. I am content with full publication of your cable and this reply.— J. W. S. McArthur.”
Wellington, October 19. To J. W. S. McArthur, Sydney.
“First, my cabled reply does not admit that the commissioner’s remark had nothing to do with the reconstruction proposals. On the contrary my cabled report affirms and I now reaffirm that in using the phrase ‘That the scheme of reconstruction that Mr McArthur had prepared’ I correctly quoted the exact words of the commissioner on the 26th September, as recorded paragraph 18891. Furthermore; I refer you to paragraphs 16338 to 16346, where on September 21 exhibit 48 was described officially as a document prepared by you outlining reconstruction of companies and by Dr Louat as an outline, a skeleton of the organization. Your evidence on the 21st September was that your plans were for a reorganization of the whole system, that exhibit 48 was the outlined scheme you had prepared for the purpose, that you commenced on it early this year and worked it out as opportunity occurred as you had the time to do so. That was the ‘scheme of reconstruction’ that the commissioner referred to on September 26. Secondly, my suggestion as to publication was that as you feared interests of debenture-holders might suffer by a quoted comment by counsel on detailed scheme being related to the skeleton scheme you should acquiesce in publication of the whole of the reported proceedings of October 4, when the complete scheme was discussed by counsel for all parties and by the commissioner.—J. G. Coates.”
Sydney, October 20. To Rt. Hon. J. G. Coates.
, “Your second cable of October 19 adds nothing to the first. You insist that you quoted the Commissioner correctly, and this has never been disputed. I say that you wrongly represented him as referring to the reconstruction proposals now before the commission, whereas in fact he was speaking of a document which purported only to be an outline of a new office system. This misrepresentation you do not even now deny. You suggest that I should acquiesce in the publication of the whole of the proceedings of October 4, but this would not direct public attention to the errors in your parliamentary statement. So far as my acquiescence or otherwise has weight with you I am not prepared to have portions of evidence selected for publication by anyone. Your reply is silent as to impropriety of such a course being taken by a Minister of the Crown, whether in Parlia-
ment or out of it, during progress of a judical inquiry.—J. W. S. McArthur.” Wellington, October 23. To J. W. S. McArthur, Sydney. “Your cable of August 20 received, but this adds nothing to your last message. As regards alleged impropriety, which is not admitted, I am content to leave matter to judgment of public of this country.—J. G. Coates.” Sydney, October 24. To the Rt. Hon. J. G. Coates.
“Your telegram of October 23 does not dispose of the fact that impropriety of your conduct as a Minister of the Crown in commenting on proceedings during the course of a judicial inquiry has conveyed a false impression, nor does your failure to admit such impropriety justify it. Since you choose to leave the matter to the judgment of the New Zealand public I am more than content to await the people’s decision, asking only that facts relating to your attack upon me, its origin, method and purpose should be fairly put before them. On what has so far happened I fear I am asking too much.— J. W. S. McArthur.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19341109.2.10
Bibliographic details
Southland Times, Issue 22474, 9 November 1934, Page 3
Word Count
1,329TRUST COMPANIES Southland Times, Issue 22474, 9 November 1934, Page 3
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Southland Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.