THE APPEAL COURT.
Electric Telegraph—Press Association Wellington, July 30.
Continuing argument for the respondent in the appeal case Keddie v. Millar, Alt' Raymond contended that though the hue inflicted was in its inception a penalty in its enforcement. it was ny section 101 of the Arbitration Act- treated merely as a civil debt and imprisonment for its non-payment bad been abolished by the Act of 1874. If the tine still remained a penalty it was a penalty recoverable only by action for debt, and, therefore, the remedy of a writ of attachment. which was devised really as a remedy tor contempt of court, was not available.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PAHH19070730.2.23
Bibliographic details
Pahiatua Herald, Volume XIII, Issue 2779, 30 July 1907, Page 5
Word Count
106THE APPEAL COURT. Pahiatua Herald, Volume XIII, Issue 2779, 30 July 1907, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Pahiatua Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.